Skip to main content
. 2020 May 29;20:218. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01804-2

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in meta-analysis

Study author Year Country Ethnicity Total cases/controls Sex cases/controls Genotyping method Mean age
Cases/Controls
Quality score
MMP9
 Nelissen et al. 2000 Sweden European 199/146

M = NR

F=NR

PCR-RFLP NR/NR 6
 Zivkovic et al. 2007 Serbia European 187/282

M = 67/140

F = 120/142

Touch Down PCR 35.5 ± 10.1/40.8 ± 14.8 7
 Benesova et al. 2008 Czech Republic European 244/132

M = 63/45

F = 181/87

PCR-SSP 38.4 ± 10.2/35.6 ± 11.7 7
 Mirowska-Guzel et al. 2009 Poland European 234/190

M = 66/76

F = 168/114

PCR-RFLP 40.09 ± 10.19/40.09 ± 10.19 7
 Fernandes et al. 2009 Brazil South-American 158/191

M = 41/54

F = 117/137

PCR-RFLP 38.7 ± 13/35.6 ± 9.5 6
 La Russa et al. 2010 Italy European 243/173

M = 96/107

F = 147/66

PCR-RFLP 41.1 ± 12.2/28.5 ± 9.4 7
 Valado et al. 2017 Portugal European 169/183

M = 48/63

F = 121/120

PCR-RFLP 41.44 ± 0.84/39.09 ± 0.96 6
 Ibrahim et al. 2019 Egypt African 50/100

M = 18/NR

F = 32/NR

PCR-RFLP 32.9 ± 8.1/NR 5
 Sabbagh et al. 2019 Iran Asian 100/105

M = 37/41

F = 63/64

PCR-ARMS 42.89 ± 10.48/46.52 ± 8.90 5
 Sadr et al. 2019 Iran Asian 170/200

M = 121/142

F = 49/58

PCR-RFLP 33.34 ± 7.91/31.88 ± 9.79 7
MMP3
 Djuric et al. 2008 Serbia European 184/236

M = NR

F=NR

Touch Down PCR NR/NR 7
 Rahimi et al. 2016 Iran Asian 121/106

M = 24/17

F = 97/89

PCR-RFLP 35.3 ± 9.1/34.5 ± 11.4 6
MMP2
 Benesova et al. 2008 Czech Republic European 240/132

M = 60/45

F = 180/87

PCR-SSP 38.4 ± 10.2/35.6 ± 11.7 7
 Aksoy et al. 2016 Turkey European 102/102

M = 76/75

F = 26/27

Taq man 36.69 ± 8.33/35.93 ± 8.20 6
 Liutkeviciene et al. 2018 Lithuania European 26/26

M = NR

F=NR

Taq man 36/34 5