Skip to main content
. 2020 May 29;20:218. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01804-2

Table 3.

Main results of pooled ORs in meta-analysis of MMP family gene polymorphism

Subgroup Sample size Test of association Test of heterogeneity Test of publication bias (Begg’s test) Test of publication bias (Egger’s test)
Genetic model Case/Control OR 95%CI(P-value) I2 (%) P Z P T P
MMP9
Overall Dominant 1754 / 1702 1.62 1.03– 2.53 (0.03) 85.5 ≤0.001 0.80 0.42 1.27 0.24
Recessive 1754 / 1702 2.69 1.68 – 4.29 (≤0.001) 27 0.20 -1.46 0.14 -2.17 0.06
Allelic 1754 / 1702 1.51 1- 2.28 (0.04) 87.8 ≤0.001 0.27 0.78 0.34 0.74
TT vs. CC 1754 / 1702 3.20 1.87 – 5.46 (≤0.001) 50 0.04 -1.04 0.29 -1.90 0.9
CT vs.CC 1754 / 1702 1.53 1.02 – 2.28 (0.04) 80.8 ≤0.001 0.98 0.32 1 0.34
MMP3
Dominant 305/342 1.18 0.66-2.13 (0.57) 0 0.57 -1 0.31 * *
Recessive 305/342 0.57 0.18-1.79 (0.33) 88.5 ≤0.001 1 0.31 * *
Allelic 305/342 1.11 0.88-1.41 (0.39) 0 0.91 1 0.31 * *
6A6A vs. 5A5A 305/342 1.15 0.62- 2.11 (0.43) 0 0.48 -1 0.31 * *
5A6A vs.5A5A 305/342 1.24 0.64 – 2.39 (0.52) 0 0.54 1 0.31 * *
MMP2
Overall Dominant 368 /552 1.36 0.39 – 4.78 (0.07) 90.4 ≤0.001 0.52 0.60 0.04 0.97
Allelic 368 /552 1.15 0.36 – 3.61 (0.81) 91.9 ≤0.001 0.52 0.60 0.14 0.91
CT vs.CC 368 /552 1.50 0.52 – 4.35 (0.45) 85.9 ≤0.001 0.52 0.60 -0.10 0.93

* Egger’s test was not calculable