Skip to main content
. 2020 May 27;11:2042018820927179. doi: 10.1177/2042018820927179

Table 3.

CMR findings.

Female controls
n = 14
Female
T2D patients
n = 67
Male
controls
n = 16
Male
T2D patients
n = 62
p value
LV end-diastolic volume indexed to BSA, ml/m2 81 ± 13 73 ± 12 93 ± 19** 78 ± 12 <0.0001
LV mass index, g/m2 41 ± 6 43 ± 7 51 ± 14*** 52 ± 8 <0.0001
LV mass to LV end-diastolic volume, g/ml 0.50 ± 0.10 0.60 ± 0.11* 0.56 ± 0.11*** 0.67 ± 0.13**, <0.0001
LV ejection fraction, % 60 ± 6 63 ± 7 59 ± 6 60 ± 6 NS
LA biplane end-systolic volumes, ml/m2 71 ± 16 70 ± 19 63 ± 16 72 ± 21 NS
Biplane LAEF, % 59 ± 10 59 ± 7 60 ± 8** 55 ± 6 0.0094
Peak systolic circumferential strain, negative (–), % 23.5 ± 1.8 22.7 ± 2.8 19.1 ± 2.6*** 20.5 ± 2.6 <0.0001
Peak circumferential diastolic strain rate, s1 1.41 ± 0.48 1.53 ± 0.31 1.26 ± 0.35 1.31 ± 0.35 0.0005

Values are mean ± SD or percentages.

BSA, body surface area; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; LAEF, left atrial ejection fractions; LV, left ventricular; SD, standard deviation; T2D, type 2 diabetes.

*

p < 0.05 female T2D versus female controls, with Bonferroni Correction.

p < 0.05 female T2D versus male T2D, with Bonferroni Correction.

**

p < 0.05 male T2D versus male controls, with Bonferroni Correction.

***

p < 0.05 male versus female controls, with Bonferroni Correction.