Skip to main content
. 2020 May 29;1(6):568–572. doi: 10.1038/s43018-020-0083-x

Fig. 2. Comparison of traditional and adapted clinical trial pipelines.

Fig. 2

Side-by-side comparison of a traditional interventional cancer clinical trial assessment schedule with implications for patients, and the suggested protocol adaptations that might result in clinical cancer research that is more patient-centered, resilient and efficient. PIS, participant information sheet; ECG, electrocardiogram; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; CT, computed tomography; AEs, adverse events; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.