Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 29.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Apr 15;57(5):719–728. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.01.022

Table 4.

Adjusted associations of vitamin D biomarkers with venous calcification (i.e. proportion with any calcification)

Vitamin D metabolite Tertile Model 1a (n = 519)
Model 2b (n = 505)
OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value
1,25(OH)2D, pm/mL > 20.49 Ref. .91 Ref. .75
8.48–20.49 0.99 (0.52–1.92) 0.87 (0.44–1.73)
< 8.48 0.87 (0.43–1.76) 0.74 (0.35–1.60)
25(OH)D, ng/mL > 30 Ref. .82 Ref. .70
20–30 1.21 (0.63–2.35) 1 (0.50–2.02)
< 20 1.01 (0.51–2.03) 0.75 (0.35–1.63)
Bioavailable 25(OH)D, ng/mL > 2.95 Ref.c .40 Ref.d .48
1.67–2.95 1.02 (0.52–2.00) 0.91 (0.45–1.83)
< 1.67 1.58 (0.76–3.29) 1.42 (0.65–3.10)
24,25(OH)2D3, ng/mL > 0.44 Ref. .64 Ref. .43
0.18–0.44 0.72 (0.36–1.44) 0.63 (0.31–1.30)
< 0.18 0.89 (0.43–1.83) 0.89 (0.42–1.89)

OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.

a

Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, and black race.

b

Model 2 adds adjustment for body mass index, maintenance dialysis status, previous diabetes, education, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, and use of calcitriol, paricalcitol, and vitamin D supplementation.

c

n = 402 overall.

d

n = 390 overall.