Skip to main content
. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233458

Table 7. The network equation in estimated SAO models for the NetSense and NetHealth study participants.

NetSense NetHealth
Model 1 Model 2
beta (s.e.) beta (s.e.)
Rate parameter (period 1) 12.93*** (1.04) 41.51*** (5.84)
Rate parameter (period 2) 9.25*** (0.62) 37.96*** (5.48)
Rate parameter (period 3) 6.02*** (0.57) 24.49*** (2.43)
Out-degree (density) -6.27*** (0.34) -7.16*** (0.38)
Reciprocityss 7.25*** (0.70) 10.35*** (0.62)
Transitive triplets 0.92*** (0.10) 0.51*** (0.11)
Transitive reciprocated triplets -0.91*** (0.13) -0.32* (0.15)
Out-degree—activity 0.17 (0.25) -0.49* (0.23)
In-degree—activity -0.26 (0.57) 0.68 (0.42)
In-degree—popularity -0.03 (0.05) 0.00 (0.01)
In-in degree^(1/2) assortativity 0.05 (0.12) 0.27*** (0.05)
Same residence hall 0.69*** (0.09) 0.00 (0.10)
Woman alter -0.02 (0.12) 0.69** (0.26)
Woman ego 0.02 (0.11) -0.93* (0.36)
Gender homophily selection -0.05 (0.07) 0.17** (0.06)
Same race 0.21** (0.07) 0.14* (0.06)
Same religious preference 0.14* (0.07) 0.04 (0.04)
Parental annual income homophily selection 0.28* (0.14) 0.11 (0.09)
Parental highest degree homophily selection -0.08 (0.15) 0.04 (0.10)
Extraversion homophily selection 0.05 (0.18) 0.08 (0.14)
Agreeableness homophily selection 0.19 (0.19) 0.12 (0.12)
Conscientiousness homophily selection -0.27 (0.19) 0.15 (0.14)
Neuroticism homophily selection 0.21 (0.20) 0.17 (0.18)
Openness homophily selection 0.26 (0.19) 0.32* (0.14)
Frequency discussing politics with friends homophily selection 0.19 (0.13) 0.07 (0.07)
Same partisanship 0.03 (0.08) -0.04 (0.04)
Political orientation alter -0.04 (0.05) 0.09 (0.15)
Political orientation ego 0.03 (0.05) -0.09 (0.16)
Political orientation homophily selection 0.14 (0.22) 0.30 (0.18)
Overall maximum convergence ratio 0.24 0.23

† Two-sided p<0.1

* Two-sided p<0.05

** Two-sided p<0.01

*** Two-sided p<0.001.