Skip to main content
. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233322

Table 3. Biometric data of immature female (n = 4), immature male (n = 6) and maturing male (MM-1, n = 8; MM-2, n = 6) Atlantic salmon.

Biometric data IMF IMM MM-1 MM-2 ANOVA (P-value)
M G
Body weight (g) 5411 ± 169 a 5370 ± 209 a 5405 ± 334 a 5590 ± 531 a 0.79 0.94
VSI 6.64 ± 0.47 b 6.76 ± 0.14 b 5.30 ± 0.50 ab 4.19 ± 0.28 a <0.01 0.11
HSI 0.81 ± 0.02 ab 0.87 ± 0.02 b 0.73 ± 0.02 a 0.73 ± 0.03 a <0.01 0.35
GSI 0.11 ± 0.01 a 0.06 ± 0.01 a 3.09 ± 0.51 b 6.25 ± 0.40 c <0.01 0.04
Gutted yield (%) 88.4 ± 0.5 b 87.9 ± 0.2 b 84.8 ± 0.2 a 0.07 0.21

IMF = immature females; IMM = immature males; MM-1/-2 = maturing males (1: GSI<5 and 2: GSI>5); VSI = viceralsomatic index; HSI = Hepatosomatic index; GSI = Gonadosomatic index. Mean±SE. Statistical analysis by 2-way ANOVA, mean effect of maturation status (M; immature vs maturing) and gender (G; females vs males), followed by Tukey post hoc test were different letters denote significant differences (P<0.05) among groups.