Skip to main content
. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0232947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232947

Table 2. GRADE quality assessment of treatment comparisons for primary outcomes in adult bacterial meningitis.

Treatment Comparison Direct evidences Network meta-analysis
Risk ratio (95% CI) Quality of evidences Risk ratio (95% CI) Quality of evidences
All-cause mortality
CS+ABT vs. Double 0.45 (0.05 to 3.9) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW 2.62 (0.30 to 22.77) ⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW
CS+ABT vs. Mono 0.95 (0.55 to 1.62) ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE 0.65 (0.42 to 1.03) ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE
Double vs. Mono - ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE 0.58 (0.01 to 49.59) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW
Neurological sequelae
CS+ABT vs. Double 1.93 (0.37 to 10.01) ⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW 0.67 (0.14 to 3.17) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW
CS+ABT vs. Mono 0.95 (0.55 to 1.62) ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE 0.75 (0.47 to 1.18) ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE
Double vs. Mono - ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE 0.50 (0.10 to 2.47) ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE
Any hearing loss
CS+ABT vs. Double 1.81 (0.48 to 6.83) ⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW 0.72 (0.21 to 2.49) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW
CS+ABT vs. Mono 0.80 (0.55 to 1.14) ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE 0.64 (0.55 to 1.62) ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE
Double vs. Mono - ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE 0.72 (0.21 to 2.49) ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE

Abbreviations: Mono, Mono antibiotic therapy; Double, Dual antibiotic therapy; CS, Corticosteroids; ABT, Antibiotic(s); CI, Confidence interval; RR, Risk ratio