Table 7. Results of Model 1 and Model 2 of ordered logistic regression including variables applicable to the whole population and the new ‘supervariable’ obtained from factor analysis, named ‘incident anxiety’ (N = 2,101).

	A. Model 1		B. Model 2
	Ordered logistic regression showing log odds coefficient (R2 = 0.21)		Ordered logistic regression showing odds ratios (R2 = 0.21)
Variables	Coefficient	95% CI	Odds Ratios	95% CI
gender     2 (male)	-0.10	(-0.28, 0.07)	0.90	(0.76, 1.08)
Age
3 (25–34)	0.17	(-0.16, 0.50)	1.19	(0.85, 1.65)
4 (35–49)	0.52	(0.20, 0.83)***	1.67	(1.23, 2.29)***
5 (50–64)	0.89	(0.57, 1.21)***	2.44	(1.78, 3.36)***
6 (65+)	0.98	(0.66, 1.30)***	2.67	(1.94, 3.68)***
Edu
2 (undergrad degree)	0.06	(-0.23, 0.36)	1.07	(0.79, 1.43)
3 (higher Diploma_	-0.03	(-0.38, 0.32)	0.97	(0.68, 1.38)
4 (A-Level)	0.16	(-0.13, 0.46)	1.18	(0.87, 1.59)
5 (GCSE)	0.12	(-0.20, 0.44)	1.13	(0.82, 1.55)
6 (primary education)	0.48	(-0.20, 1.16)	1.62	(0.82, 3.20)
7 (pre-primary education)	-0.02	(-1.34, 1.29)	0.98	(0.26, 3.67)
A1     2 (No)	0.33	(0.15, 0.50)***	1.39	(1.16, 1.65)***
A2     2 (No)	0.18	(-0.10, 0.46)	1.20	(0.90, 1.59)
O4	-0.20	(-0.26, -0.14)***	0.82	(0.77, 0.87)***
E5
2 (0 to 1 years)	-1.37	(-1.62, -1.13)***	0.25	(0.20, 0.32)***
3 (2 years or more)	-1.72	(-1.97, -1.48)***	0.18	(0.14, 0.23)***
Incident anxiety	0.43	(0.23, 0.64)***	1.54	(1.26, 1.89)***
I18
2 (somewhat agree)	-1.57	(-1.89, -1.25)***	0.21	(0.15, 0.29)***
3 (neither agree nor disagree)	-1.90	(-2.20, -1.61)***	0.15	(0.11, 0.20)***
4 (somewhat disagree)	-2.81	(-3.14, -2.48)***	0.06	(0.04, 0.08)***
5 (strongly disagree)	-3.60	(-4.01, -3.20)***	0.03	(0.02, 0.04)***

R² is the goodness of fit

*P < 0.05

**P < 0.01

***P < 0.001

Variables’ levels are represented by dummy variables.