Studies in Africa |
Mahende et al10
|
Tanzania |
2–59 months |
Fever |
691 |
Cobas Indianapolis, Indiana, USA |
|
Pelkonen et al16
|
Angola |
≤16 years |
Suspected malaria |
346 |
QuikRead 101 (Orion Diagnostica, Finland) |
|
Sarfo et al18
|
Ghana |
≤15 years |
Fever |
541 |
CRP Test Kit CRP-K10 (Diagnostik Nord, Germany) |
52.2% of those with CRP 10–30 mg/L, and 53.0% of those with CRP >30 mg/L were positive for malaria parasitaemia (ORs 14.2 (95% CI 4.2 to 48.1) and 14.7 (95% CI 4.4 to 48.3) vs those with CRP <10 mg/L).
Increased CRP levels were strongly associated with clinical malaria, defined as parasitaemia >5000 parasites/µL (OR 16.5 (95% CI 2.2 to 121), p<0.001).
In a multivariate analysis, patients whose CRP level increased by >10 mg/L had more than an eightfold likelihood for positive parasitaemia (adjusted OR 8.7 (95% CI 2.5 to 30.5), p<0.001).
|
Studies in South-East Asia |
Lubell et al9
|
Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar |
5–49 years |
Acute undifferentiated fever |
1372 |
NycoCard Reader (Abott, USA) |
CRP levels were significantly higher in malaria infections compared with viral infections (p<0.001).
There was no significant difference in CRP levels between bacterial infections and malaria (p=0.15); the AUROC for discriminating between malaria and bacterial infections was 0.54 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.6).
|
Peto et al17
|
Cambodia |
>6 months |
General population |
Parasitaemia: n=328 Controls: n=328 |
Solid phase sandwich ELISA |
Plasma CRP concentrations were higher in those with malaria compared with matched controls (p=0.025).
7.6% of malaria-positive cases had CRP of >10 mg/L vs 2.1% of matched controls (p<0.001); 17.3% of malaria-positive cases had CRP of >3 mg/L vs 10.4% of matched controls.
There was a significant association between parasite count and CRP, which remained significant after controlling for fever (p<0.001).
|