Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adm Policy Ment Health. 2020 Jul;47(4):581–596. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01020-7

Table 6.

Mixed Model Standardized Beta Coefficients Predicting Validity Criteria Using the KEBSQ Correct Endorsement Short Form, Correct Rejection Short Form, and KEBSQ Full Forms Using the Validation Sample (N = 92)

Correct Endorsement Scoring
Correct Rejection Scoring
Criterion Short Form Full Form Significant Difference Between Forms? Short Form Full Form Significant Difference Between Forms?
Individual Level
EBPAS Requirements .20 .20 No −.11 −.18 No
EBPAS Appeal .27 .29* No −.19 −.18 No
EBPAS Openness −.09 −.05 No .02 .04 No
EBPAS Divergence .20 .09 Yes; p = .015 −.05 .003 No
EBPAS Total .24* .22* No −.13 −.15 No
TPC Psychodynamic −.05 .003 No −.26* −.30* No
TPC Family .06 .09 No −.21* −.20* No
TPC Cognitive Behavioral .07 .09 No −.27* −.31* No
Burnout −.08 −.14 Yes; p = .049 .05 .05 No
Organizational Level
ICS – Educational Support .05 .05 No −.05 −.05 No
OSC- Proficiency .01 −.01 Yes; p = .047 −.002 .006 No
OSC - Functionality −.01 −.02 No −.004 .01 No

Note. KEBSQ = Knowledge of Evidence Based Practice Questionnaire. EBP AS = Evidence- Based Practice Attitude Scale. TPC = Therapist Procedures Checklist. ISC = Implementation Climate Scale. OSC = Organizational Social Context.

*

p < .05