Table 2.
Associations of demographic predictors with barriers to treatmenta (n = 1,417)
| No/Low Perceived Need OR (CI) |
Any Structural Barriers OR (CI) |
Any Attitudinal Barriers OR (CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (60+, reference) | |||
| 18-29 | 0.7 (0.4-1.2) | 6.4* (1.5-28.2) | 0.2 (0.0-1.8) |
| 30-44 | 0.6 (0.3-1.0) | 5.2* (1.4-19.7) | 0.2* (0.1-0.9) |
| 45-59 | 0.6 (0.3-1.1) | 5.8* (1.5-22.2) | 0.3 (0.1-1.2) |
| F, p-value | 1.37 (p=.26) | 2.33 (p=.08) | 1.66 (p=.18) |
| Gender (male, reference) | |||
| Female | 0.7* (0.5-0.9) | 1.5 (0.9-2.6) | 1.0 (0.4-2.9) |
| Race/ethnicity (White, reference) | |||
| Asian | 4.5* (2.0-10.3) | 0.4 (0.1-1.5) | 0.3 (0.1-1.3) |
| Latino | 4.3* (2.9-6.6) | 0.8 (0.2-2.5) | 0.1* (0.0-0.3) |
| Black | 1.5 (0.9-2.6) | 0.5 (0.2-1.7) | 4.8 (0.7-33.3) |
| F, p-value | 20.91 (p<.001) | 0.81 (p=.49) | 9.44 (p=.00) |
| Education (16+ years, reference) | |||
| 0-11 | 0.6* (0.3-1.0) | 1.1 (0.5-2.3) | 0.6 (0.2-1.8) |
| 12 | 0.9 (0.5-1.6) | 1.0 (0.5-2.1) | 0.3* (0.1-1.0) |
| 13-15 | 1.3 (0.8-2.0) | 1.0 (0.4-2.3) | 0.3* (0.1-0.9) |
| F, p-value | 5.20 (p<.001) | 0.05 (p=.98) | 1.68 (p=.17) |
| Income (Continuous) | |||
| Personalized earnings | 0.8* (0.6-1.0) | 1.0 (0.7-1.6) | 2.5* (1.2-4.9) |
| Disorder Severity (Mild, reference) | |||
| Severe | 0.7 (0.4-1.1) | 4.1* (2.2-7.8) | 3.2 (0.7-13.5) |
| Moderate | 0.9 (0.6-1.2) | 1.5 (0.9-2.7) | 2.7* (1.1-6.8) |
| F, p-value | 1.33 (p=.27) | 12.46 (p<.001) | 2.48 (p=.09) |
| Marital Status (Never married, reference) | |||
| Married/Cohabitating | 1.0 (0.7-1.6) | 1.4 (0.7-2.6) | 0.8 (0.2-3.4) |
| Separated/Widowed/ Divorced | 0.8 (0.5-1.4) | 1.5 (0.6-3.8) | 0.6 (0.1-5.7) |
| F, p-value | 1.00 (p=.37) | 0.55 (p=.58) | 0.09 (p=.91) |
| # of disorders (Continuous) | |||
| # mood | 0.5* (0.4-0.7) | 1.6 (1.0-2.8) | 0.4* (0.2-0.9) |
| # anxiety | 0.7* (0.5-0.8) | 1.5* (1.1-2.0) | 0.9 (0.5-1.6) |
| # substance use | 0.5* (0.3-0.9) | 1.4 (0.8-2.3) | 1.5 (0.4-6.2) |
| # externalizing | 2.0 (0.7-5.9) | 3.6 (0.9-14.5) | -b |
| Poverty (% in county, continuous) | |||
| % Below poverty level | 0.9 (0.2-3.9) | 6.8 (0.6-78.0) | 0.0 (0.0-5.1) |
| Race/Ethnicity (% in county, continuous) | |||
| % Latino | 0.4* (0.2-1.0) | 0.7 (0.1-4.4) | 2.7 (0.3-22.5) |
| % Asian | 0.5 (0.1-4.8) | 0.1 (0.0-2.6) | 0.0 (0.0-1.1) |
| % Black | 1.0 (0.4-2.7) | 0.8 (0.1-5.7) | 3.1 (0.0-249.2) |
| Urbanicity (Metro, reference) | |||
| Urban | 1.3 (1.0-1.8) | 0.9 (0.4-2.4) | 0.9 (0.1-6.0) |
| Rural | 1.3 (0.7-2.6) | 0.3* (0.1-1.0) | -b |
| F, p-value | 1.42 (p=.25) | 2.11 (p=.13) | 0.01 (p=.91) |
Significant at the .05 level, two-sided test
Based on multivariate logistic regression models
Number of externalizing disorders and rural urbanicity were dropped from analysis because they predict the outcome perfectly.