Table 5.
Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) ranking of the models that explain the number of non-anguillid eel diadromous species in rivers of Japan (a), and coefficient values and associated probability of the best model (b).
| (a) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Explanatory variable | |||||||
| Depth | Distance from river mouth | Sediment | Vegetation | Velocity | Trans-river structure | AIC | ∆AIC | |
| 1 | −0.048 | 0.008 | −0.019 | 323.5 | 0 | |||
| 2 | −0.044 | + | 0.009 | −0.019 | 324.1 | 0.542 | ||
| 3 | −0.048 | 0.058 | 0.009 | −0.018 | 325.3 | 1.716 | ||
| 4 | −0.002 | −0.048 | 0.008 | −0.019 | 325.3 | 1.729 | ||
| (b) | ||||||||
| Parameter | Estimate | Standard error | z value | p value | ||||
| (Intercept) | 1.767 | 0.105 | 16.811 | 0.0000* | ||||
| Trans-river structure | −0.019 | 0.005 | −3.639 | 0.0003* | ||||
| Distance from river mouth | −0.048 | 0.014 | −3.315 | 0.0009* | ||||
| Velocity | 0.008 | 0.002 | 4.317 | 0.0000* | ||||
Plus and blank indicate significant or no significant effects of qualitative variable on the density of anguillid eels, respectively. ∆AIC indicates differences between AIC values of the best model (Rank 1) and selected model. The asterisks indicate statistical significant values.