Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 28;17(3):363–373. doi: 10.1007/s13770-020-00249-5

Table 2.

The outcomes of treatment with osteoblasts on bone turnover markers’ level in primary osteoporosis rat model

Group Parameter
OSX (pg/ml) BALP (ng/ml) SOST (pg/ml) BSP (pg/ml)
Sham 481.2 ± 20.72 50.70 ± 3.86 130.00 ± 41.07 218.20 ± 12.31
Osteoporotic

187.5 ± 124.37a,b

(− 61.03%)

67.50 ± 11.45a

(33.13%)

556.50 ± 71.53a

(328.07 %)

435.00 ± 124.37a

(99.35%)

OM

425.0 ± 25.00b

(126.6 %)

55.00 ± 8.10b

(–18.51%)

520.00±90.82a

(− 6.55%)

377.00 ± 95.95a

(–13.33%)

Au-NPs

462.0 ±  92.03b

(146.4%)

47.10 ± 2.65b

(–30.22%)

191.86±27.01b,c

(− 65.52%)

233.20 ± 33.78b,c

(– 46.39%)

Au/HA-NPs

440.0 ± 22.36b

(134.66%)

58.00±11.51

(–14.07%)

422.00±98.33a,b,c,d

(− 24.16 %)

290.00 ± 72.02b,c

(– 33.33%)

Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation (S.D.)

aSignificant change at p   <  0.05 versus the sham group

bSignificant change at p   <  0.05 versus the osteoporotic group

cSignificant change at p   < 0.05 versus the OM group

dSignificant change at p   < 0.05 versus the Au-NPs group

(%): Percentage change versus the corresponding control value