Table 4.
Compartmentalized metabolites | Mass isotopomers | Average labeling (% 13C abundance) | |
---|---|---|---|
[13C]GLC | [13C]Gln | ||
AcCoAp | M+0 | 49.74±1.04 | 89.19±0.68 |
M+1 | 10.64±0.48 | 4.59±0.36 | |
M+2 | 41.57±0.83 | 6.54±0.59 | |
AcCoAc | M+0 | 59.30±1.14 | 48.07±0.85 |
M+1 | 15.08±0.63 | 9.97±0.32 | |
M+2 | 25.62±1.84 | 41.96±1.28 | |
H6Pp | M+0 | 9.99±0.87 | 92.16±0.71 |
M+1 | 7.55±1.07 | 7.31±0.64 | |
M+2 | 49.44±6.16 | 0.52±0.33 | |
M+3 | 12.71±1.43 | 0.02±0.27 | |
M+4 | 6.71±2.92 | 0.00±0.25 | |
M+5 | 3.84±3.89 | 0.01±0.25 | |
M+6 | 9.97±0.61 | 0.00±0.25 | |
G6Pc | M+0 | 7.96±1.16 | 92.37±1.14 |
M+1 | 5.53±0.49 | 6.56±0.46 | |
M+2 | 43.30±0.61 | 0.81±0.97 | |
M+3 | 13.70±0.56 | 0.19±0.32 | |
M+4 | 9.75±0.56 | 0.05±0.27 | |
M+5 | 9.21±0.46 | 0.02±0.27 | |
M+6 | 10.92±0.35 | 0.01±0.26 | |
F6Pc | M+0 | 7.56±1.21 | 92.66±0.46 |
M+1 | 5.24±0.46 | 6.68±0.45 | |
M+2 | 42.79±0.59 | 0.44±0.30 | |
M+3 | 14.42±0.66 | 0.18±0.29 | |
M+4 | 9.92±0.55 | 0.03±0.27 | |
M+5 | 9.91±0.51 | 0.00±0.25 | |
M+6 | 10.44±0.47 | 0.00±0.26 | |
GLCc | M+0 | 10.14±1.19 | 92.43±0.46 |
M+1 | 3.08±1.01 | 6.86±0.43 | |
M+2 | 54.69±3.07 | 0.57±0.31 | |
M+3 | 8.42±1.12 | 0.11±0.33 | |
M+4 | 5.08±0.84 | 0.02±0.27 | |
M+5 | 4.57±0.93 | 0.01±0.26 | |
M+6 | 14.23±1.38 | 0.01±0.26 |
For the labeling information of plastidic and cytosolic acetyl-CoA, McLafferty fragments of palmitic (C16:0) and erucic acids (C22:1) were analyzed, respectively, by GC-MS (n=3). Starch and sucrose glucosyls were subject to LC-MS/MS to elucidate the labeling of plastidic and cytosolic hexoses, respectively. MID and the average labeling abundance (%) in each carbon were determined for the compounds listed from [13C]GLC and [13C]Gln experiments. The values are the average of three biological replicates ±SD. Cytosolic and plastidic compounds are denoted as ‘c’ and ‘p’, respectively.