Table 1.

Summary of reviewed supply chain resilience literature reviews

Paper	Uses NAS definition of resilience, or equivalent	Addresses SC modeling/simulation	Addresses SC dependency on other networks	Addresses metrics for resilience	Addresses disruption modelling	Includes geographic analysis
Bogataj and Bogataj (2019)	No	Yes	Yes	No	No	No
Gligor et al. (2019)	Yes (P&H 2009)	No	No	No	No	No
Hosseini et al. (2019a, b)	Yes/No go through resilience definition, but then make a new concept called "resilience capacity"	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes (contributing authors/organizations)
Namany et al. (2019)	No	Yes	Yes	No	No	No
Oliveira et al. (2019)	Yes, list a lot of author definitions, including P&H, only barely say "plan"	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes (first author/organization)
Panetto et al. (2019)	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No
Bak (2018)	No	Yes	No	No	No	Yes (countries studied and authors/organizations)
Behzadi et al. (2018)	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No
Ciccullo et al. (2018)	No	Yes	No	No	No	No
Deprá et al. (2018)	No	No	No	No	No	No
Dolgui (2018)	No	Yes	No	No	Yes	No
Ivanov (2018)	No	Yes	Yes (C2 only)	No	Yes	No
Pinho de Lima et al. (2018)	Yes (use P&H and others collectively)	No	No	No	No	Yes (regions studied and authors/organizations)
Ribeiro and Barbosa-Povoa (2018)	Yes (readiness, response, recovery, growth)	Yes	Yes (C2 only)	Yes	Yes	Yes (corresponding author/organization)
Stone and Rahimifard (2018)	Yes	Yes (very minorly)	No	Yes	No	No
Ali et al. (2017)	Yes	No	No	No	Yes	No
Datta (2017)	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	No
Fassam and Dani (2017)	No	No	No	No	No	No
Graça and Camarinha-Matos (2017)	No (absorb and recover only)	Yes	Yes (C2 only)	Yes	No	No
Ivanov (2017)	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No
Linnenluecke (2017)	No	No	No	No	No	No
Rajagopal et al. (2017)	No	Yes	Yes (C2 only)	No	Yes	No
Smart et al. (2017)	No	No	No	No	No	Yes (first author/organization)