Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 30.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920956. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20956

Table 4.

Estimated Mean Differences in Psychosocial, Family, and Clinical Variables Across Groups After Weighting by Raked Propensity Scores

Characteristica Mean (95% CI)
Ideation Suicide Attempt Nonsuicidal Self-injury
Passive Active
Nonspecific Specific
Financial adversity 0.68 (0.54-0.82)b 0.73 (0.59-0.86)b 0.89 (0.66-1.12)b 1.20 (0.88-1.52)b 0.84 (0.65-1.03)b
Internalizing problems 54.5 (53.6-55.5)b 55.3 (53.7-56.9)b 56.3 (54.5-58.0)b 59.1 (57.4-61.0)b 55.0 (53.9-56.2)b
Externalizing problems 51.4 (50.5-52.3)b 53.4 (52.1-54.6)b 52.5 (50.6-54.3)b 57.1 (54.3-60.0)b 52.2 (50.8-53.6)b
Parentalmonitoring 25.4(25.0-25.8)b 24.7 (24.3-25.2)b 23.8 (23.1-24.6)b 23.4 (22.7-24.1)b 24.4 (24.0-24.8)b
Caregiver acceptance 10.8 (10.6-11.0) 10.6 (10.4-10.8)b 10.2 (9.8-10.5)b 10.3 (9.9-10.7)b 10.5 (10.3-10.6)b
Family conflict 2.6 (2.4-2.7)b 2.9 (2.6-3.1)b 3.2 (3.0-3.5)b 3.5 (3.1-4.0)b 2.9 (2.7-3.0)b
a

A total of 133 participants did not provide financial adversity scores, 11 did not have scores on internalizing or externalizing problems, 23 did not have parental monitoring scores, 34 did not have data on caregiver acceptance, and 24 did not have family conflict scores.

b

A significant difference was found between those endorsing the suicide or self-injury variable and those who did not at P < .05 in a 2-sided test after Benjamini-Hochberg familywise error adjustment.