Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 27;48(10):5306–5317. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa223

Table 2.

Association of CGI and TATA presence with tissue specificity (τ)

A Promoters Enhancers
CGI Non-CGI P-value CGI Non-CGI P-value
Overall 0.278 0.771 <10−300 0.795 0.944 <10−300
B Promoters Enhancers
TATA+ TATA P-value TATA+ TATA P-value
Overall 0.726 0.480 1.9 × 10−77 0.961 0.939 1.1 × 10−131
CGI 0.482 0.269 1.7 × 10−22 0.878 0.791 7.3 × 10−8
Non-CGI 0.820 0.761 1.7 × 10−9 0.962 0.942 3.6 × 10−108

The table shows τ medians of different subsets of promoters and enhancers. (A) τ medians according to CGI status. (B) τ medians for CGI and non-CGI promoters and enhancers according to the presence (TATA+) or absence (TATA) of a TATA box. P-values were calculated with the Mann–Whitney U test. The values are derived from tissue data.