Table 1.
Validity: Variation in initial serving size and level of agreement between plate waste assessed by weight and the visual quarter-waste method for foods from 748 trays in 9 middle school and high school cafeterias in one Washington State school district during May 2014, by food type
Agreement between Weight and Visual Quarter-Waste Method | Variation in Initial Serving Size | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Food or beverage item Food: Entrees | n | κa | Standard errorbc | Standard deviation (g)d | Coefficient of variation (%)d |
Hot dog | 18 | 0.96 | 0.193 | ||
Cheese pizza | 107 | 0.84 | 0.069 | ||
Fish taco | 19 | 0.82 | 0.148 | ||
Canadian bacon and pineapple pizza | 37 | 0.80 | 0.126 | ||
Seafood basket | 56 | 0.80 | 0.095 | ||
Sub sandwich | 72 | 0.75 | 0.077 | ||
Pepperoni pizza | 57 | 0.74 | 0.100 | ||
Chicken tenders | 67 | 0.64 | 0.084 | 13.1 | 16 |
Burger | 26 | 0.59 | 0.153 | ||
Chicken Caesar entree salad | 12 | 0.56 | 0.187 | ||
Food: Side items | |||||
Dinner roll | 50 | 0.93 | 0.1101 | 1.36 | 3 |
Soup | 58 | 0.92 | 0.095 | ||
Side fries | 221 | 0.66 | 0.049 | 14.3 | 12 |
Fries with entree | 108 | 0.63 | 0.067 | 19.3 | 16 |
Rice with entree | 12 | 0.58 | 0.167 | ||
Food: Fruits and vegetables | |||||
Fruit cup | 32 | 0.83 | 0.132 | 8.1 | 6 |
Potato salad | 29 | 0.83 | 0.150 | 13.1 | 11 |
Fruit of the day | 16 | 0.82 | 0.188 | ||
Baby carrots | 53 | 0.82 | 0.096 | 2.6 | 4 |
Raisins | 9 | 0.81 | 0.253 | 8.1 | 6 |
Grapes | 10 | 0.80 | 0.283 | ||
Orange | 17 | 0.80 | 0.217 | 17.4 | 10 |
Applesauce | 30 | 0.79 | 0.132 | ||
Apple | 61 | 0.79 | 0.088 | 8.6 | 7 |
Lettuce/tomato/pickle cup | 22 | 0.77 | 0.138 | 8.0 | 11 |
Corn | 12 | 0.73 | 0.191 | 6.6 | 8 |
Side salad | 14 | 0.16 | 0.123 | 13.1 | 11 |
Beverages | |||||
Orange juice | 109 | 0.85 | 0.073 | 0.9 | 1 |
Chocolate milk | 333 | 0.83 | 0.041 | 1.4 | 1 |
White milk | 114 | 0.83 | 0.070 | 1.3 | 0 |
Apple juice | 388 | 0.82 | 0.038 | 1.5 | 1 |
Measures the amount by which the agreement between two ratings exceeds that expected by chance. κ=1 when agreement is perfect and κ=0 when agreement is no better than chance.
Because trays were randomly distributed to members of the research team, these standard errors do not account for differences between raters.
For small numbers of pairs (<30) there is reduced confidence in the reliability of these standard errors.
To examine the possibility of variation in initial serving sizes impacting validity analyses, standard deviations and coefficients of variation of “uneaten weight” measurement in grams was calculated for foods with at least four recorded weights for a whole, uneaten portion. These statistics are only related to one of the ratings, the gold standard weight, used to calculate the κ statistics. They are not related to the quarter-waste method rating.