Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Jul 6;117(11):1816–1821. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.05.004

Table 1.

Validity: Variation in initial serving size and level of agreement between plate waste assessed by weight and the visual quarter-waste method for foods from 748 trays in 9 middle school and high school cafeterias in one Washington State school district during May 2014, by food type

Agreement between Weight and Visual Quarter-Waste Method Variation in Initial Serving Size
Food or beverage item Food: Entrees n κa Standard errorbc Standard deviation (g)d Coefficient of variation (%)d
Hot dog 18 0.96 0.193
Cheese pizza 107 0.84 0.069
Fish taco 19 0.82 0.148
Canadian bacon and pineapple pizza 37 0.80 0.126
Seafood basket 56 0.80 0.095
Sub sandwich 72 0.75 0.077
Pepperoni pizza 57 0.74 0.100
Chicken tenders 67 0.64 0.084 13.1 16
Burger 26 0.59 0.153
Chicken Caesar entree salad 12 0.56 0.187
Food: Side items
Dinner roll 50 0.93 0.1101 1.36 3
Soup 58 0.92 0.095
Side fries 221 0.66 0.049 14.3 12
Fries with entree 108 0.63 0.067 19.3 16
Rice with entree 12 0.58 0.167
Food: Fruits and vegetables
Fruit cup 32 0.83 0.132 8.1 6
Potato salad 29 0.83 0.150 13.1 11
Fruit of the day 16 0.82 0.188
Baby carrots 53 0.82 0.096 2.6 4
Raisins 9 0.81 0.253 8.1 6
Grapes 10 0.80 0.283
Orange 17 0.80 0.217 17.4 10
Applesauce 30 0.79 0.132
Apple 61 0.79 0.088 8.6 7
Lettuce/tomato/pickle cup 22 0.77 0.138 8.0 11
Corn 12 0.73 0.191 6.6 8
Side salad 14 0.16 0.123 13.1 11
Beverages
Orange juice 109 0.85 0.073 0.9 1
Chocolate milk 333 0.83 0.041 1.4 1
White milk 114 0.83 0.070 1.3 0
Apple juice 388 0.82 0.038 1.5 1
a

Measures the amount by which the agreement between two ratings exceeds that expected by chance. κ=1 when agreement is perfect and κ=0 when agreement is no better than chance.

b

Because trays were randomly distributed to members of the research team, these standard errors do not account for differences between raters.

c

For small numbers of pairs (<30) there is reduced confidence in the reliability of these standard errors.

d

To examine the possibility of variation in initial serving sizes impacting validity analyses, standard deviations and coefficients of variation of “uneaten weight” measurement in grams was calculated for foods with at least four recorded weights for a whole, uneaten portion. These statistics are only related to one of the ratings, the gold standard weight, used to calculate the κ statistics. They are not related to the quarter-waste method rating.