Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Jul 6;117(11):1816–1821. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.05.004

Table 2.

Interrater reliability: Level of agreement between plate waste assessed by two raters in using the visual quarter-waste method for foods from 59 trays in 3 middle school and high school cafeterias in one Washington State school district during May 2014

Food or beverage item n κa Standard errorbc
Food
Cheese pizza 11 1.0 0.302
Fries with entree 9 1.0 0.270
Hot dog 6 1.0 0.320
Baby carrots 5 1.0 0.338
Seafood basket 5 1.0 0.374
Sub sandwich 9 0.91 0.249
Canadian bacon and pineapple pizza 5 0.89 0.237
Side fries 13 0.69 0.233
Pepperoni pizza 7 0.59 0.344
Beverage
White milk 12 1.0 0.237
Chocolate milk 31 0.87 0.137
Orange juice 6 0.81 0.281
Apple juice 33 0.78 0.128
a

Measures the amount by which the agreement between two ratings exceeds that expected by chance. κ=1 when agreement is perfect and κ=0 when agreement is no better than chance.

b

For small numbers of pairs (<30) there is reduced confidence in the reliability of these standard errors.

c

Because trays were randomly distributed to members of the research team, these standard errors do not account for differences between raters.