Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 12;50(6):2128–2141. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03969-3

Table 3.

Narrative differences across groups

ASD group, M (SD) ASD control group, M (SD) Significance testing, F/η2 ASD parent group, M (SD) Parent control group, M (SD) Significance testing, F/η2
PB structured narration 0.80 (0.09) 0.83 (0.08) F(1,71) = 2.24/0.03 0.81 (0.12) 0.81 (0.10) F(1,204) = 0.01/0.00
TAT unstructured narration 0.39 (0.11) 0.51 (0.09) F(1,67) = 18.59/0.22 0.45 (0.11) 0.50 (0.08) F(1,208) = 7.17/0.03
1 “Violin Image” 0.42 (0.19) 0.60 (0.09) F(1, 67) = 21.72/0.24 0.51 (0.15) 0.55 (0.16) F(1,208) = 2.12/0.01
2 “Farmland Image” 0.44 (0.16) 0.53 (0.15) F(1,67) = 4.70/0.07 0.51 (0.15) 0.58 (0.11) F(1,208) = 10.26/0.05
3 “Window Image” 0.42 (0.15) 0.44 (0.12) F(1,67) = 0.04/0.00 0.43 (0.14) 0.46 (0.10) F(1,208) = 2.03/0.01
4 “Surgery Image” 0.37 (0.15) 0.45 (0.14) F(1,67) = 5.01/0.07 0.43 (0.14) 0.47 (0.12) F(1,208) = 4.14/0.02
5 “Sleep Image” 0.35 (0.20) 0.53 (0.14) F(1,67) = 13.93/0.17 0.39 (0.17) 0.43 (0.14) F(1,208) = 1.60/0.01
6 “Man, Woman Gaze Image” 0.35 (0.17) 0.47 (0.18) F(1,67) = 7.73/0.10 0.43 (0.17) 0.48 (0.13) t(1,208) = 3.48/0.02

η2 convention: 0.01 = small, 0.06 = medium, 0.14 = large effects

M, mean; SD, standard deviation

Bold findings indicate significant differences at the level of p < 0.05