Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Maturitas. 2019 Jul 11;128:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.07.005

Table 2:

Weighted analysis of the likelihood of having poor HRQoLa among different levels of physical activity based on intensity

No. with poor HRQoL/ No. of participants Model Ib
OR (95% CI)
Model IIc
OR (95% CI)
Model IIId
OR (95% CI)
Model IVe
OR (95% CI)
Physical Health
 VIPA 1904/8847 1 (ref) 1 (ref) 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
 LMPA 1507/4736 1.67 (1.43, 1.96) 1.36 (1.15, 1.60) 1.24 (1.04, 1.48) 1.22 (1.02, 1.46)
 No PA 3900/8353 3.09 (2.72, 3.50) 2.79 (2.45,3.18) 1.97 (1.72, 2.59) 1.82 (1.58, 2.10)
p-value < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Mental Health
 VIPA 777/8847 1 (ref) 1 (ref) 1 (ref) 1 (ref)
 LMPA 926/4736 2.37 (1.93, 2.91) 1.31 (1.06, 1.63) 1.16 (0.92, 1.46) 1.15 (0.91, 1.44)
 No PA 1848/8353 2.69 (2.27, 3.17) 2.00 (1.67, 2.39) 1.34 (1.11, 1.62) 1.28 (1.05, 1.55)
p-value < 0.001 < 0.001 0.010 0.044

Abbreviations: HRQoL – health related quality of life; No PA -no physical activity, LMPA - light to moderate physical activity; VIPA - vigorous physical activity; OR -odds ratio; CI – confidence interval; ref – reference group

a

Poor HRQoL is defined as having 14 or more physical or mental unhealthy days

b

Model I: unadjusted model

c

Model II: adjusted for age, sex, race

d

Model III: adjusted for age, sex, race, education, income, smoking status, BMI, and number of chronic conditions

e

Model IV: adjusted for age, sex, race, education, income, smoking status, BMI, number of chronic conditions and CHD groups.