Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Cancer. 2019 Dec 2;125:130–141. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.029

Table 2.

Comparison of demographics for patients with localized ESOS who received CT vs no CT, and patients who received RT vs no RT

No Chemotherapy
N=190
Received Chemotherapy
N=178
p-value
No Radiotherapy
N=218
Received Radiotherapy
N=152
p-value
Age
(yrs)
Median 64 55 <0.001* 58 59 0.20
Range 21 – 88 19 – 79 19 – 88 21 – 88
19–40 years 26 (42.6) 35 (57.4) <0.001* 46 (75.4) 15 (24.6) 0.003*
41–65 years 78 (42.4) 106 (57.6) 95 (51.6) 89 (48.4)
>65 years 86 (69.9) 37 (30.1) 77 (61.6) 48 (38.4)
Sex Male 108 (56.8) 108(60.7) 0.46 121 (55.5) 96 (63.2) 0.16
Female 82 (43.2) 70 (39.3) 97 (44.5) 56 (36.8)
Depth of Tumour Superficial 47 (24.7) 23 (13.3) 0.007 * 49 (22.6) 22 (14.9) 0.08
Deep 143 (75.3) 150 (86.7) 168 (77.4) 126 (85.1)
Maximal Tumor Diameter
(cm)
19 NAs
Median 8.1 8.8 0.32 8.4 9.1 0.40
Range 1.4 – 45.0 1.0 – 42.0 1.0 – 45.0 1.0 – 42.0
Margin Status Negative (R0) 156 (83.4) 151 (86.3) 0.58 187 (87.4) 122 (81.3) 0.27
Microscopi c positive (R1) 19 (10.2) 17 (9.7) 17 (7.9) 19 (12.7)
Gross positive (R2) 12 (6.4) 7 (4.0) 10 (4.7) 9 (6.0)

(NA = not available)