Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2019 Dec 4;39(6):801–813. doi: 10.1002/sim.8446

Table 1.

Comparison of type 1 errors based on 20,000 replications (in %)

Continuous Binary
Scenarios (+/−/0) α level famGEa rareGEb BTc famGEa rareGEb BTc
4/0/16 5 4.96 5.30 5.01 5.03 5.51 5.07
1 1.00 1.10 1.02 1.02 1.25 1.05
0.1 0.10 0.17 0.10 0.12 0.18 0.11
16/0/4 5 5.04 5.38 5.00 4.84 5.70 5.00
1 0.91 1.16 0.99 0.97 1.41 0.94
0.1 0.10 0.16 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.10
2/2/16 5 4.80 5.25 5.00 4.97 5.56 5.06
1 0.95 1.20 1.01 0.94 1.16 0.97
0.1 0.10 0.14 0.11 0.11 0.16 0.11
8/8/4 5 5.02 5.31 4.93 4.89 5.55 4.79
1 0.90 1.11 0.99 0.97 1.27 0.94
0.1 0.10 0.17 0.12 0.10 0.16 0.10

+/−/0: number of variants with main genotype effect sizes that are positive, negative, and neutral

a

famGE: our proposed method accounting for family correlation

b

rareGE: interaction test ignoring family correlation

c

BT: burden test