Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 20;7(3):1085–1094. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12629

Table 2.

Implantation and post‐implantation characteristics for recovery patients

With follow‐up (28) No follow‐up (17) P‐value
Device strategy <0.001
BTT 22 (78.5%) 7 (36.9%)
DT 2 (7.1%) 2 (10.5%)
Rescue therapy 4 (14.3%) 2 (10.5%)
Bridge to recovery 0 (0%) 8 (42.1%)
Device type 0.204
HeartMate II 14 (50%) 6 (31.6%)
HVAD 11 (39.3%) 9 (47.4%)
HeartMate 3 2 (7.1%) 0 (0%)
PVAD 0 (0%) 2 (10.5%)
Other/unknown 1 (3.6%) 2 (10.5%)
Concomitant cardiac procedures
PFO/ASD closure 3 (10.7%) 2 (10.5%)
Tricuspid repair 1 (3.6%) 4 (21.1%)
Tricuspid replacement 1 (5.3%)
Aortic repair 1 (5.3%)
Aortic valve replacement 1 (3.6%)
Mitral repair 1 (5.3%)
CABG 1 (5.3%)
Concomitant temporary RVAD implantation 2 (7.1%) 2 (10.5%) 1.000
Time in OR (min) 208 (130–683) 276 (95–375) 0.600
Cardiopulmonary bypass time (min) 75 (95–147) 124 (50–235) 0.034
ICU stay (days) 17 (4–147) 27 (2–66) 0.377
Hospital stay (days) 30 (17–165) 39 (14–144) 0.328

ASD, atrial septal defect; BTT, bridge to transplantation; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; DT, destination therapy; ICU, intensive care unit; OR, operating room; PFO, patent foramen ovale; RVAD, right ventricular assist device.

Values are median (range) or n (%).