Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Obes (Lond). 2019 Dec 2;44(6):1311–1318. doi: 10.1038/s41366-019-0499-5

Table 2.

Comparison of conclusions for self-reported versus measured weight from six studies of women in the UK and the United States with similar values of correlations, mean differences, and limits of agreement (LOA)

Author (reference) Study sample Correlation Mean difference (kg) LOA (kg) Conclusion
Lower Upper
Lawlor et al. [50] 1310 women from the British Women’s Heart & Health Study, recruited 1999–2000 at ages 60–79 years 0.98 1.0 −4 6.0 Self-report of weight should not be relied upon in prospective epidemiological studies or clinical practice when accuracy at the level of the individual is required.
Spencer et al. [51]a 2938 women from the Oxford-European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC) study in England recruited in 1993–1999 at ages 35–76 (median 52) >0.9 1.4 −3.4 6.2 Self-reported … weight data have been shown here to be valid for identifying associations in epidemiological studies. In analyses where anthropometric factors are the primary variables of interest, measurements in a random sample of the study population can be used to improve the accuracy of estimates of height, weight, and BMI.
Wright et al. [52]a 3999 women from the Million Women Study in England and Scotland, recruited between 1996 and 2001 at ages 50–64, measured in 2008 0.97 1.1 −5.0 7.2 Overall, however, we found that self-reported weight … [is] suitable for use in epidemiological analyses with long-term follow-up.
Pirie et al. [53]a,b 1059 women ages 40–59 from the Minnesota sample of the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Program ages 40–59, measured ca. 1980 0.97 1.8 −3.8 7.4 Caution should be used when applying these results to individuals. The standard deviations of reporting discrepancy are high relative to the mean discrepancy … reported height and weight are not accurate as measures of true height and weight.
Rimm et al. [54]a,b 140 women from the US Nurses’ Health Study, ages 41–64 at measurement in 1987 0.97 1.1 −4.4 6.5 Self-reported … weight measurements appear reasonably valid.
Luo et al. [55]a,b 75,336 women from the US Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study ages 51–79 at baseline in 1993–1998 0.97 0.9 −6.4 8.2 [T]his large prospective study confirmed previously reported results that women demonstrate relatively valid estimates of body weight.
a

LOA calculated as mean difference ± 2 SD based on published mean difference, sample size, and SE or SD

b

Converted from lb. to kg