Table 3.
Assessment of vaginal laxity in group 2 (n = 11 patients who answered question 2 of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire) before and at the 3- and 12-month follow-ups
|
Patient no. |
Before | 3 months FU | 12 months FU |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 7 | 2 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 9 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 10 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 11 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Average (95% CI) | 1.82 (1.31–2.32) | 2.91 (2.44–3.38) | 3.60 (2.83–4.37) |
| P-value (FU vs before) | 0.029∗ | 0.0006† |
ANOVA = analysis of variance; FU = follow-up.
Increasing numbers denote increasing sensation of vaginal tightness (see Table 1). Statistical significance was determined using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons test.
∗
P < .05.
†
P < .001.