Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 30;8(2):195–204. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2019.12.002

Table 3.

Urologists' diagnosis of ED and CVD in patients with ED in different group

Characteristics Whether to strictly follow process when diagnosing ED
Whether to do examination to ED patients
Whether to inquired about CVD in ED patients
Whether the progress of ED and CVD is consistent
Yes (n = 344) No (n = 59) Yes (n = 348) No (n = 55) Yes (n = 361) No (n = 42) Yes (n = 289) No (n = 114)
Age (years old)
 ≤40 P = .751 P = .871 P = .026 P = .454
 >40
Gender
 Male P = .478 P = .464 P = .837 P = .781
 Female
Professional years (years)
 ≤20 P = 1.000 P = .617 P = .155 P = .250
 >20
Educational background
 Under bachelor's degree P = .018 P = .494 P = .849 P = .160
 Bachelor's degree
 Postgraduate degree
 Doctoral degree
Level of hospital
 Community hospital P = .306 P = .125 P = .351 P = .114
 Secondary hospital
 Tertiary hospital

CVD = cardiovascular disease; ED = erectile dysfunction.