Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 4;8(2):282–289. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.01.004

Table 2.

Results of the sEMG measurements at the baseline and after the last therapy for both treated groups (G1 and G2) and control subjects (G3) presented as mean followed by 95% confidence interval in brackets

Group Peak MVC (μV)
Average MVC (μV)
Resting level (μV)
Endurance (s)
Baseline After Baseline After Baseline After Baseline After
G1 (n = 50) 19.49 (2.31) 30.06†,∗∗∗ (3.75) 11.33 (1.54) 17.99†,∗ (2.50) 3.83†,∗ (0.82) 2.08 (0.38) 27.86†,∗∗ (4.17) 41.30†,∗∗∗ (5.21)
G2 (n = 25) 19.56 (2.93) 21.00 (2.82) 13.39 (2.46) 14.30 (2.42) 2.42 (0.45) 3.94†,∗∗∗ (0.60) 18.20 (2.85) 24.80 (3.12)
G3 (n = 20) 41.96 (2.51) - 32.69 (1.88) - 1.90 (0.63) - 62.25 (3.68) -

EMG = electromyography; MVC = maximal voluntary contraction; sEMG = surface electromyography.

Significantly different results (P ≤ .002) against control are depicted by and ∗ denotes significantly higher EMG values for comparison of G1 and G2.

P < .05, ∗∗P < .01, ∗∗∗P < .001.