Table 3.
FIT64b key components | Hospital departments | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | |
I: Shifting service users from in- to outpatient settings | ||||||||||
Number of outpatient CoT1/total number SoT2 during EP3 (%) | 55,77 | 47,22 | 32,29 | 61,37 | 53,10 | 69,93 | 71,88 | x4 | 60,62 | 43,37 |
II: Flexible care management across settings | ||||||||||
Treatment D5, I6, and/or O7 in the same unit (ward, level etc.)8 |
++++ | ++++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
Systematic steering of treatment beyond all SoT2,8 | +++ | ++++ | ++ | + | + | + | + | + | + | ++ |
Number SoT2-spanning sessions (meetings etc.)8 | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | + | ++ | + | ||
Application of SoT2-spanning roster and therapy plans8 | ++++ | ++++ | ++ | ++ | ++++ | ++ | ++ | + | +++ | ++ |
III: Continuity of treatment team | ||||||||||
Percentage of staff working in more than one SoT2 (on a regular basis) |
>66% | >66% | >66% | >33% | >66% | >66% | >33% | >33% | ||
Coordinated admission (coordinating staff member)9 | + | + | + | + | + | |||||
Coordination of treatment by e.g. case manager9 | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||
Outreach home care by I6- and D5-teams10 | + | ++ | ++ | + | + | |||||
Outsourced outpatient department team (not working in I6 or D5)9 |
+ | |||||||||
VI: Outreach home care | ||||||||||
Implementation of outreach home care9 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||
Corresponding outreach care model11 | ACT | ACT/CRT | ACT | ACT | ACT | CRT | CRT | ACT/CRT | ||
Number of cars | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
1CoT, case of treatment; 2SoT, setting of treatment (outpatient, day-patient, inpatient); 3EP, evaluation period; 4x, data not provided; 5D, day-patient; 6I, inpatient; 7O, outpatient; 8 Maximum expression of parameter = ++++; 9Maximum expression of parameter = +; 10Maximum expression of parameter = ++. 11Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) or Crisis Resolution Teams (CRT).