Skip to main content
. 2020 May 25;12:140. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00140

Table 3.

Top 10 adjusted associations from model C, small sMRI regions vs. visit 1 exposures: serum 25(OH)D, folate and cobalamin (overall and stratified analysis) with uncorrected P < 0.05: ordinary least square brain scan-wide analyses on HANDLS 2004–2009 and HANDLS-SCAN 2011–2015a.

Outcome (vscan) Outcome description Exposure (v1) Stratum (N) β (SE) P Standardized Beta (b) q-value Passes FW Bonferroni correction Standardized Beta (b): SAb Puncorr: SA
OVERALL
Left_OCP_occipital_pole Left occipital pole 25(OH)D __ (186) +15.70 (3.83) 6.3e-05 +0.31 0.026 Yes +0.27 < 0.001
occipital_lobe_WM_left Occipital lobe, white matter, left 25(OH)D __ (186) +76.8 (20.7) 2.9e-04 +0.26 0.061d No +0.26 < 0.001
Right_PoG_post-central_gyrus Post-central gyrus, right 25(OH)D __ (186) +34.8 (9.7) 4.3e-04 +0.27 0.061d No +0.27 0.001
parietal_lobe_WM_right Parietal lobe, white matter, right 25(OH)D __ (186) +127.9 (38.1) 9.8e-04 +0.24 0.10d No +0.23 0.002
Left_PoG_post-central_gyrus Post-central gyrus, left 25(OH)D __ (186) +34.1 (10.4) 1.3e-03 +0.25 0.11d No +0.25 0.002
Right_TrIFG_triangular_part_of_t Triangular part of the inferior frontal gyrus, right B-12 __ (240) +0.45 (0.14) 2.2e-03 +0.20 0.13 No +0.19 0.017
parietal_lobe_WM_left Parietal lobe, white matter, left 25(OH)D __ (186) +123.4 (40.4) 3.1e-03 +0.22 0.13d No +0.21 0.007
occipital_lobe_WM_right Occipital lobe, white matter, right 25(OH)D __ (186) +63.6 (21.1) 3.0e-03 +0.21 0.13d No +0.21 0.005
Right_TMP_temporal_pole Right temporal pole FOL __ (240) −35.5 (11.9) 2.7e-03 −0.19 0.13 No −0.22 0.010
Anterior insula, right Right_AIns_anterior_insula B-12 __ (240) +0.36 (0.12) 3.2e-03 +0.17 0.13 No +0.13 0.071
STRATIFIED
Left_OCP_occipital_pole Left occipital pole 25(OH)D AP (132) +19.0c (4.3) 2.0e-05 +0.35 0.07 Yes +0.32 < 0.001
Right_TMP_temporal_pole Right temporal pole FOL Whites (141) −63.9c (15.2) 4.8e-05 −0.34 0.08d No −0.42 < 0.001
Left_OCP_occipital_pole Left occipital pole 25(OH)D Men (87) +24.0 (5.8) 8.0e-05 +0.45 0.09d No +0.46 < 0.001
Left_OCP_occipital_pole Left occipital pole 25(OH)D Whites (109) +17.7 (4.5) 1.6e-04 +0.33 0.11d No +0.31 0.001
Right_PoG_post-central_gyrus Right post-central gyrus 25(OH)D Men (87) +64.4c (16.6) 1.6e-04 +0.43 0.13d No +0.47 0.001
Parietal_lobe_WM_right Right parietal lobe, White matter 25(OH)D Men (87) +242.6c (63.4) 2.6e-04 +0.45 0.13d No +0.46 0.001
occipital_lobe_WM_left Occipital lobe, white matter, left 25(OH)D >50 (80) +107.7 (28.0) 3.4e-04 +0.37 0.14d No +0.28 0.004
parietal_lobe_WM_left Parietal lobe, white matter, left 25(OH)D >50 (80) +201.8c (53.6) 3.4e-04 +0.39 0.14d No +0.34 0.003
occipital_lobe_WM_right Occipital lobe, white matter, right 25(OH)D Men (87) +132.3c (35.9) 4.1e-04 +0.43 0.14d No +0.44 0.001
Right_PHG_parahippocampal_gyrus Right parahippocampal gyrus FOL Whites (141) −20.6c (5.7) 4.2e-04 −0.27 0.14 No −0.38 < 0.001

25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; AP, Above poverty; B-12, serum cobalamin (vitamin B-12); FDR, False Discovery Rate; FOL, serum folate; FWER, FamilyWise Error Rate; GM, Gray Matter; SA, Sensitivity Analysis; SE, Standard Error; WM, White Matter.

a

Values are adjusted linear regression coefficients β with associated SE, standardized beta, uncorrected p-values, corrected q-values (false discovery rate) and results of sensitivity analysis. (N) is the sample size in each analysis. Bolded rows correspond to statistically significant associations after correction for multiple testing, FWER < 0.05.

b

Based on a sensitivity analysis further adjusting for selected socio-demographic, lifestyle and health-related factors after screening using machine learning techniques (see Supplemental Methods 2). Note that for visit 1 25(OH)D, no additional covariates were selected. For Folate and B-12 a reduced set of additional covariates were included and are listed in Supplemental Methods 2.

c

P < 0.10 for null hypothesis that exposure × stratifying variable 2-way interaction term is =0 in the unstratified model with exposure and socio-demographic factors included as main effects.

d

Finding considered a trend for passing FDR q-value correction at type I error of 0.10 per vitamin, model and stratification status while failing the FWER criterion, due to a standardized effect size (in absolute value) ≥0.20.