Skip to main content
. 2020 May 25;8:398. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00398

Table 4.

Comparison of adsorption capacities (qm, mg/g) and rates (T, min) of various adsorbents for Ce(III) and Gd(III).

Adsorbent Ce(III) Gd(III) References
qm (mg/g) T (min) qm (mg/g) T (min)
Zn/Al LDH-intercalated cellulose 96.25 10 Iftekhar et al., 2017
Corn style 180.20 240 Jaya et al., 2014
Prawn carapace 218.30 360 Jaya et al., 2014
Mesoporous conjugate adsorbent 192.31 25 Awual et al., 2013
Loofah fiber-g-acrylic acid (LF-AA) 527.5 120 Liu et al., 2017
Wheat straw 298.60 100 Zhou et al., 2016
Poly(allylamine)/silica composite 111.8 60 Zhou S. et al., 2014
Colloidal graphene oxide 286.86 30 Chen et al., 2014
1,2-HOPO-SAMMS 80 30 Yantasee et al., 2010
Cross-linked polyvinyl amidoxime fiber 14.83 150 Yang et al., 2018
By-pass cement 100 Ali et al., 2011
Polyethyleneglycol (phosphomolybdate and tungstate) 57 Zhang et al., 2009
CTS-g-(AA-co-SS)/ISC hydrogel 174.05 20 223.79 20 Wang et al., 2017a
Kenaf cellulose-based poly(hydroxamic acid) 245 220 Rahman et al., 2017
CMC-g-PAM/ATP 205.48 30 216.73 30 This study