Table I.
Study | Study population | Design | No. of subjects/No. of controls | Control strategy | Major findings | Reported limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brown et al (1984)8 | Men of draft age (18–31 y) during World War II (1941–1945) in the Melanoma Cooperative Group at NYU SOM database | Case-control | 89/5 | Age-matched male NYU dermatology patients with cutaneous problems, excluding malignant melanoma | 34% of patients with melanoma lived in tropics vs 6% of control subjects | N/A |
Page et al (2000)23 | White male former World War II POWs | Cohort | 5524/3713 | White male non-POW World War II veterans | No significant differences in melanoma rates | - Low sample size with low melanoma mortality risk of 2 per 1000 veterans - Survivor bias |
Zhou et al (2010)24 | White active duty military personnel (ACTUR) with diagnosis of melanoma from 1990 to 2004 | Cohort | 1545/33612 | General US population (SEER-9 registries) with diagnosis of melanoma from 1990 to 2004 | - Higher melanoma rates among military personnel >45 y old - Highest melanoma incidence in Air Force branch |
- Limited case reporting to ACTUR and SEER databases - Data consolidation differences between ACTUR and SEER - Military selection bias for young, healthy people |
Lea et al (2014)25 | Active duty military (ACTUR and MDR) 18–56 y of age with diagnosis of melanoma from 2001 to 2007 | Cohort | 1105/46082 | General US population (SEER-17 registries) with diagnosis of melanoma from 2001 to 2007 | - Melanoma incidence rate was 62% greater in active military personnel - Highest melanoma incidence among Air Force branch |
- Limited case reporting to ACTUR, MDR, and SEER databases - Limited interpretation of nonwhite patients because of small sample size - Potential increased detection of melanoma through military screening |
ACTUR, Active Central Tumor Registry; MDR, Medical Device Reporting; N/A, not available; NYU SOM, New York University School of Medicine; POW, prisoner of war; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results.