Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;22:40. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00630-2

Table 2.

Evaluation of segments by conventional coronary angiography, contrast-enhanced coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography (CE-CCMRA) and dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)

Artery No. of Segments ≥ 1.5 mm on x-ray No. of Assessable Segments on CE-CCMRA (%) No. of Assessable Segments on DS-CCTA (%)
LM 51 51 (100%) 51 (100%)
LAD
 Proximal 51 50 (98%) 51 (100%)
 Middle 51 49 (96%) 51 (100%)
 Distal 48 43 (90%) 46 (96%)
 Diagonal branches 56 43 (77%) 50 (89%)
LCX
 Proximal 51 50 (98%) 51 (100%)
 Distal 41 34 (83%) 37 (90%)
 Marginal branches 61 39 (64%) 53 (87%)
RCA
 Proximal 51 50 (98%) 51 (100%)
 Middle 51 49 (96%) 51 (100%)
 Distal 49 46 (94%) 47 (96%)
 PDA/PL 93 74 (80%) 80 (86%)
Total 654 578 (88%) 619 (95%)

DS-CCTA dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography, CE-CCMRA contrast-enhanced coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography, LAD left anterior descending coronary artery, LCX left circumflex coronary artery, LM left main coronary artery, PDA/PL posterior descending artery/posterolateral branch, CAG conventional coronary angiography, RCA right coronary artery, CE contrast-enhanced