Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2020 May 12;63(10):5526–5567. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00424

Table 4.

Analogs exploring concurrent 4-methoxyphenyl ether and 4-methoxybenzamide replacement.

Compound ID graphic file with name nihms-1592058-t0011.jpg D3R agonist activity1 D2R agonist activity1 D2R antagonist activity1
Ar1 = Ar2 = EC50 (nM) Emax (% control) EC50 (nM) Emax (% control) IC50 (nM) Imax (% control)
52 3-methoxyPhen-1-yl pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-2-yl 50.0 ± 12 113 ± 2.8 128 ± 33 76 ± 8.3 Inactive Inactive
53 pyrrolo[3,2-c]pyridin-2-yl 280 ± 19 111 ± 8 830 ± 170 71 ± 7 7,400 ± 3,700 30 ± 3
54 2-indolyl 33.8 ± 8.7 105 ± 9.3 2,300 nM ± 540 48 ± 5.1 >100,000 ND
55 5-methoxy-2-indolyl 284 ± 100 110 ± 6.5 1,700 ± 324 67 ± 15 Inactive Inactive
56 benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl 285 ± 58 101 ± 12 660 ± 46 29 ± 7 2,000 ± 1,500 53 ± 10
57 3-pyridyl 4-methoxy-2-methylphen-1-yl 116 ± 29 102 ± 7.7 4,600 ± 1,100 52 ± 8.3 >100,000 ND
58 6-methoxy-2-indolyl 6.4 ± 1.5 107 ± 7 364 ± 58 81 ± 3.0 Inactive Inactive
59 5-methoxy-2-indolyl 59 ± 23 97 ± 5 2,600 ± 1,200 97 ± 2.8 Inactive Inactive
60 7-methyl-2-indolyl 25.7 ± 8.1 108 ± 6 786 ± 210 81 ± 8.5 Inactive Inactive
61 6-methyl-2-indolyl 4.3 ± 2.0 106 ± 13 138 ± 42 74 ± 4.3 Inactive Inactive
62 5-methyl-2-indolyl 13 ± 3.2 113 ± 8 1,300 ± 270 101 ± 5.1 Inactive Inactive
63 4-methyl-2-indolyl 6.9 ± 1.7 97 ± 3 180 ± 23 70 ± 7.1 Inactive Inactive
64 3-methyl-2-indolyl 80 ± 32 92 ± 13 800 ± 80 102 ± 7 Inactive Inactive
65 1-methyl-2-indolyl 37.6 ± 7.2 112 ± 8 6,200 ± 1,900 53 ± 8.7 Inactive Inactive
66 1-methyl-3-indolyl 9.5 ± 1.1 94 ± 9 4,400 ± 1,500 91 ± 17.2 Inactive Inactive
67 7-chloro-2-indolyl 33 ± 4.3 113 ± 3.4 617 ± 144 74 ± 7.8 Inactive Inactive
68 6-chloro-2-indolyl 3.0 ± 0.3 96 ± 5.5 183 ± 57 89 ± 0.4 Inactive Inactive
69 5-chloro-2-indolyl 98 ± 45 106 ± 8 1,400 ± 282 90 ± 6.3 Inactive Inactive
70 4-chloro-2-indolyl 4.4 ± 0.8 107 ± 8.4 217 ± 67 82 ± 6.5 Inactive Inactive
71 pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-2-yl 13.5 ± 6.5 98.6 ± 6.1 210 ± 83 99± 13.7 Inactive Inactive
72 pyrrolo[2,3-c]pyridin-2-yl 81 ± 26.8 116 ± 9.7 780 ± 240 66 ± 7.0 Inactive Inactive
73 pyrrolo[3,2-c]pyridin-2-yl 63 ± 20 108 ± 11 1,800 ± 460 61 ± 5.1 Inactive Inactive
74 pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyridin-2-yl 200 ± 53 105 ± 8 3,000 ± 1,100 64 ± 2 Inactive Inactive
75 benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl 33 ± 14.6 112 ± 9.8 2,400 ± 1,400 60.6 ± 4.3 Inactive Inactive
76 1H-indazol-3-yl 45 ± 6.1 97 ± 8.5 4,100 ± 1,500 71 ± 2.8 Inactive Inactive
77 benzofuran-2-yl 42 ± 8.5 104 ± 9.5 1,700 ± 63 57 ± 7.4 Inactive Inactive
78 benzothiophen-2-yl 13.3 ± 2.6 102 ± 7.7 617 ± 40 34 ± 3 2,100 ± 1,200 60 ± 4.9
79 pyrrol-2-yl 118 ± 47 110 ± 17.6 6,100 ± 1,300 34 ± 8.4 >100,000 ND
1

β-arrestin recruitment activity was assessed as described in Figure 2. Emax values are expressed as a percentage of the maximum dopamine response observed in the same assay. Imax values are expressed as a percentage of the maximum inhibition of a dopamine (EC80 concentration) response observed with the antagonist sulpiride in the same assay.

ND Curve did not plateau.