Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;145(6):e20192018. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2018

TABLE 3.

Associations of Picky-Eating Trajectories With Maternal Feeding-Behavior Trajectories

Picky-Eating Trajectory Membership, n (%) P
Low (N = 92) Medium (N = 181) High (N = 44)
CFQ restriction trajectory .01
 Low 11 (13.8)a,c 4 (2.6)b,c 2 (5.3)a,b,c
 Decreasing 39 (48.8)a,d 73 (47.0)a,c,d 14 (36.8)a,c
 High 30 (37.5)a,d 78 (50.3)a,d 22 (57.9)a,c
CFQ pressure-to-eat trajectory .21
 Low 36 (44.4) 49 (31.6) 10 (26.3)
 Decreasing 34 (42.0) 75 (48.4) 22 (57.9)
 High 11 (13.6) 31 (20.0) 6 (15.8)
CFSQ demandingness trajectory, decreasing <.001
 Low 20 (24.4)a,c 19 (11.6)a,b,c 2 (5.3)b,c
 Medium 53 (64.6)a,c 89 (54.3)a,c 18 (47.4)a,c
 High 9 (11.0)a,d 46 (28.0)b,c 18 (47.4)b,d

Fisher’s exact was test used for all comparisons. Superscripts a and b that differ from one another denote significant differences between low, medium, and high picky-eating trajectories proportionally represented by the row and/or column trajectory. Superscripts c and d that differ from one another denote significant differences between trajectories of each type in proportion represented by the column trajectory of picky eating.