Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;135(6):1306–1312. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003880

Table 4.

Influence of switching to a different contraception class on the development of incident clinical acne and treatment escalation (n=113,708)

Incident Acne
HR (95% CI), crude HR (95% CI), adj
Contraception Class
 Combined oral contraceptive [Reference]
 Progesterone only oral contraceptive 1.64 (1.19 to 2.27) 1.70 (1.23 to 2.35)
 Copper Intrauterine Device 1.80 (1.35 to 2.42) 1.76 (1.31 to 2.36)
 Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device 1.95 (1.70 to 2.23) 1.93 (1.69 to 2.22)
 Etonogestrel Implant 1.68 (1.25 to 2.24) 1.45 (1.08 to 1.95)
 DMPA Injection 0.71 (0.34 to 1.49) 0.62 (0.29 to 1.30)
 None 1.00 (0.92 to 1.09) 1.03 (0.95 to 1.12)
History of polycystic ovarian syndrome 0.81 (0.67 to 0.98)
Calendar year contraception was started 1.03 (1.01 to 1.04)
Non-acne visits prior to index date, sqrt 1.00 (0.98 to 1.03)
Non-acne visits after index date, sqrt 1.11 (1.09 to 1.14)
Age
 <20 years-old [Reference]
 20–24 years-old 0.96 (0.87 to 1.07)
 25–29 years-old 1.03 (0.93 to 1.14)
 30–34 years-old 0.93 (0.84 to 1.03)
 35–40 years-old 0.72 (0.64 to 0.79)

HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; DMPA: depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; adj: adjusted