Table 5.

Multivariate Associations – Perceived Risks by Daughter’s Dose of HPV Vaccination at follow-up^*

	Completed 1st HPV Vaccination Dose			Complete 2nd HPV Vaccination Dose			Completed 3rd HPV Vaccination Dose

Unadjusted^a	OR	95% CI		OR	95% CI		OR	95% CI
HPV vs. Control	5.96	3.38	10.49	8.09	4.0	16.35	16.5	5.73	47.48
Perceived risk for cervical cancer
Yes vs. No	1.85	0.94	3.65	2.28	1.04	4.96	1.64	0.69	3.88
DK/NS vs. No	1.32	0.68	2.56	1.51	0.69	3.3	1.38	0.59	3.23
Worry about getting infected with HPV
Yes vs. No	0.85	0.46	1.58	1.14	0.57	2.3	1.02	0.47	2.23
DK/NS vs. No	0.7	0.27	1.8	0.65	0.21	2.03	0.7	0.2	2.44
Perceived risk for HPV infection
Yes vs. No	1.26	0.6	2.61	1.0	0.44	2.28	0.56	0.2	1.56
DK/NS vs. No	0.71	0.41	1.23	0.77	0.42	1.41	0.64	0.33	1.27
Worry daughter would be infected with HPV in future
Yes vs. No	1.46	0.38	5.63	0.92	0.24	3.58	1.05	0.22	5.02
DK/NS vs. No	0.7	0.14	3.45	0.2	0.03	1.4	0.16	0.01	1.99
Perceived risk for daughter’s HPV infection in future
Yes vs. No	0.81	0.31	2.09	0.47	0.18	1.24	0.41	0.15	1.12
DK/NS vs. No	0.61	0.22	1.66	0.36	0.13	1.03	0.24	0.08	0.75
Adjusted^b
Intervention (HPV) vs. Control	5.96	3.32	10.72	7.52	3.62	15.62	15.82	5.26	47.6
Perceived risk for cervical cancer
Yes vs. No				1.25	0.53	2.93
DK/NS vs. No				1.03	0.44	2.44
Perceived risk for daughter’s HPV infection in future
Yes vs. No							0.69	0.23	2.1
DK/NS vs. No							0.76	0.2	2.82

N=259 participants at follow-up. Intent to treat HPV arm=126, control arm=133.

Unadjusted statistically significant (p<0.05) OR in bold.

OR adjusted by mother’s age, time in US, income, and daughter’s health insurance status. No demographic significant. Significant HPV predictors only shown in adjusted multivariate logistic models.