Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 2;2015(8):CD006849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006849.pub3

Goodman 1990.

Methods STUDY DESIGN: Parallel study
 LOCATION, NUMBER OF CENTRES:
 DURATION OF STUDY: September 1982 to September 1984
 CONCEALMENT OF ALLOCATION: D
 DESCRIBED AS RANDOMISED: Yes
 DESCRIBED AS DOUBLE BLIND: No
 METHOD OF RANDOMISATION WELL‐DESCRIBED/APPROPRIATE: Not described
 METHOD OF BLINDING WELL‐DESCRIBED/APPROPRIATE: Not described
 DESCRIPTION OF WITHDRAWALS/DROP‐OUTS: Not described
GRADE ASSESSMENT QUALITY RATING: Low
 TYPE OF ANALYSIS (AVAILABLE CASE/TREATMENT RECEIVED/ ITT): ITT
Participants ELIGIBILITY
 INCLUSION CRITERIA:
 Patients with previously untreated limited disease SCLC
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
 Patients with extensive disease SCLC
 N RANDOMISED: 388
 ASSESS STAGE: Yes (LD only)
 (N LIMITED): 388
 (N EXTENSIVE):
 M: 247
 F: 141
 AGE: Median 61 in both arms
Interventions TYPE: Chemotherapy
 REGIMENS:
 EVAC ‐ VP‐16, 75 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 2 and 3, vincristine 1.0 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8, Adriamycin 40 mg/m2 IV on day 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV on day 1
 Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for 6 cycles
VP‐16/CDDP alternating with VAC ‐ VP‐16 100 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 2 and 3, CDDP 100 mg/m2 IV on day 1, vincristine 1.0 mg/m2 IV on days 22 and 29, Adriamycin 50 mg/m2 IV on day 22, cyclophosphamide, 750 mg/m2 on day 22
 Treatment was repeated every 6 weeks for a total of 6 cycles
CO‐INTERVENTIONS:
 Chest irradiation
 Prophylactic cranial irradiation
CLASSIFICATION OF INTERVENTION (ADJUVANT/NEO‐ADJUVANT/PALLIATIVE):
 Palliative
Outcomes OUTCOMES MEASURED:
 Survival
 Tumour response
 Toxicity
FOLLOW UP ASSESSMENT POINTS:
 OUTCOMES INCLUDED IN ANALYSES:
 Survival
 Tumour response
 Toxicity
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Participants Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Investigators Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Survival Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Tumour Response Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Toxicity Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Quality of Life Unclear risk N/A
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Survival High risk Reasons for withdrawals, drop‐outs and exclusions not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Tumour Response High risk Reasons for withdrawals, drop‐outs and exclusions not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Toxicity High risk Reasons for withdrawals, drop‐outs and exclusions not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Quality of Life Unclear risk N/A
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Adequate
Other bias Low risk Adequate