Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 2;2015(8):CD006849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006849.pub3

White 2001.

Methods STUDY DESIGN: Parallel group
 LOCATION, NUMBER OF CENTRES:
 DURATION OF STUDY: June 1996 to January 1999
 CONCEALMENT OF ALLOCATION: D
 DESCRIBED AS RANDOMISED: Yes
 DESCRIBED AS DOUBLE BLIND: No
 METHOD OF RANDOMISATION WELL‐DESCRIBED/APPROPRIATE: Not described
 METHOD OF BLINDING WELL‐DESCRIBED/APPROPRIATE: Not described
 DESCRIPTION OF WITHDRAWALS/DROP‐OUTS: Adequate
GRADE ASSESSMENT QUALITY RATING: High
 TYPE OF ANALYSIS (AVAILABLE CASE/TREATMENT RECEIVED/ ITT): ITT
Participants ELIGIBILITY
 INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients with histologically or cytologically proven SCLC were eligible for inclusion in the study. They were required to have either a Karnofsky Performance status <= 50 and/or at least 2 of the following adverse prognostic indicators: Karnofsky Performance status < 60; extensive disease; and elevated alkaline phosphatase, lactic dehydrogenase, or low sodium.
Patients had received no previous chemotherapy, surgery, or radiotherapy for SCLC, and no prior malignancy was permitted except basal cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix. A creatinine clearance of at least 30 mL per minute was required, and patients with liver derangement were only eligible if their plasma bilirubin was < 35 mol/L.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
 N SCREENED:
 N RANDOMISED: 119 (CAV ‐ 59; Carboplatin ‐ 60)
 N COMPLETED:
 ASSESS STAGE: Yes
 (N LIMITED): (CAV ‐ 17; Carbo ‐ 21)
 (N EXTENSIVE): (CAV ‐ 42; Carbo ‐ 39)
 M: (CAV ‐ 34; Carbo ‐ 29)
 F: (CAV ‐ 25; Carbo ‐ 31)
 MEAN AGE: CAV ‐ median 70 (46 to 85); Carbo 70 (54 to 76)
Interventions REGIMENS:
 Control arm ‐ in the control arm, CAV was administered on day 1 of a 3‐week cycle for 4 cycles. This consisted of cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV, vincristine 1.3 mg/m2 IV (to a maximum of 2 mg), and doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 IV, all given as a bolus on day 1.
Experimental arm ‐ patients who were allocated to the experimental arm received 4 courses of single‐agent carboplatin IV infused over 1 hour and administered at 4‐week intervals. The dosage was derived from the formula of Calvert giving an AUC of 7.
Dose reductions were not performed. Chemotherapy was delayed if there was evidence of sepsis or persisting myelosuppression (white blood cells < 3000/mm3, neutrophils < 1500/mm3, and platelets < 100,000/mm3) at the time of scheduled retreatment.
Control arm ‐ In the event of significant peripheral neuropathy, vincristine was omitted.
CO‐INTERVENTIONS:
 Patients who had limited disease and an objective response to treatment could be considered for consolidation thoracic and prophylactic cranial irradiation.
Erythropoietin and growth factors were permitted at the individual physician's discretion.
Outcomes OUTCOMES MEASURED:
 Primary: toxicity
 Secondary: objective response rate; survival; quality of life
FOLLOW UP ASSESSMENT POINTS:
 OUTCOMES INCLUDED IN ANALYSES:
 Toxicity
 Objective response rate
 Survival
 Quality of life
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Participants Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Investigators Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Survival Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Tumour Response Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Toxicity Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Quality of Life Unclear risk N/A
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Survival Low risk Reasons for withdrawals, drop‐outs and exclusions reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Tumour Response Low risk Reasons for withdrawals, drop‐outs and exclusions reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Toxicity Low risk Reasons for withdrawals, drop‐outs and exclusions reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Quality of Life Unclear risk N/A
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information
Other bias Low risk Adequate