White 2001.
Methods | STUDY DESIGN: Parallel group
LOCATION, NUMBER OF CENTRES:
DURATION OF STUDY: June 1996 to January 1999
CONCEALMENT OF ALLOCATION: D
DESCRIBED AS RANDOMISED: Yes
DESCRIBED AS DOUBLE BLIND: No
METHOD OF RANDOMISATION WELL‐DESCRIBED/APPROPRIATE: Not described
METHOD OF BLINDING WELL‐DESCRIBED/APPROPRIATE: Not described
DESCRIPTION OF WITHDRAWALS/DROP‐OUTS: Adequate GRADE ASSESSMENT QUALITY RATING: High TYPE OF ANALYSIS (AVAILABLE CASE/TREATMENT RECEIVED/ ITT): ITT |
|
Participants | ELIGIBILITY
INCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients with histologically or cytologically proven SCLC were eligible for inclusion in the study. They were required to have either a Karnofsky Performance status <= 50 and/or at least 2 of the following adverse prognostic indicators: Karnofsky Performance status < 60; extensive disease; and elevated alkaline phosphatase, lactic dehydrogenase, or low sodium. Patients had received no previous chemotherapy, surgery, or radiotherapy for SCLC, and no prior malignancy was permitted except basal cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix. A creatinine clearance of at least 30 mL per minute was required, and patients with liver derangement were only eligible if their plasma bilirubin was < 35 mol/L. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: N SCREENED: N RANDOMISED: 119 (CAV ‐ 59; Carboplatin ‐ 60) N COMPLETED: ASSESS STAGE: Yes (N LIMITED): (CAV ‐ 17; Carbo ‐ 21) (N EXTENSIVE): (CAV ‐ 42; Carbo ‐ 39) M: (CAV ‐ 34; Carbo ‐ 29) F: (CAV ‐ 25; Carbo ‐ 31) MEAN AGE: CAV ‐ median 70 (46 to 85); Carbo 70 (54 to 76) |
|
Interventions | REGIMENS:
Control arm ‐ in the control arm, CAV was administered on day 1 of a 3‐week cycle for 4 cycles. This consisted of cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV, vincristine 1.3 mg/m2 IV (to a maximum of 2 mg), and doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 IV, all given as a bolus on day 1. Experimental arm ‐ patients who were allocated to the experimental arm received 4 courses of single‐agent carboplatin IV infused over 1 hour and administered at 4‐week intervals. The dosage was derived from the formula of Calvert giving an AUC of 7. Dose reductions were not performed. Chemotherapy was delayed if there was evidence of sepsis or persisting myelosuppression (white blood cells < 3000/mm3, neutrophils < 1500/mm3, and platelets < 100,000/mm3) at the time of scheduled retreatment. Control arm ‐ In the event of significant peripheral neuropathy, vincristine was omitted. CO‐INTERVENTIONS: Patients who had limited disease and an objective response to treatment could be considered for consolidation thoracic and prophylactic cranial irradiation. Erythropoietin and growth factors were permitted at the individual physician's discretion. |
|
Outcomes | OUTCOMES MEASURED:
Primary: toxicity
Secondary: objective response rate; survival; quality of life FOLLOW UP ASSESSMENT POINTS: OUTCOMES INCLUDED IN ANALYSES: Toxicity Objective response rate Survival Quality of life |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Participants | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Investigators | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Survival | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Tumour Response | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Toxicity | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Quality of Life | Unclear risk | N/A |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Survival | Low risk | Reasons for withdrawals, drop‐outs and exclusions reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Tumour Response | Low risk | Reasons for withdrawals, drop‐outs and exclusions reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Toxicity | Low risk | Reasons for withdrawals, drop‐outs and exclusions reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Quality of Life | Unclear risk | N/A |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information |
Other bias | Low risk | Adequate |