Antoniou 2005.
| Methods | Randomized trial of electrostimulation Country: Greece Recruitment. no details | |
| Participants | Smokers (no other details) | |
| Interventions | Single application of an electrical probe to the ear, (duration not stated) giving a) electrical stimulus with current intensity between 12‐20 mAmp, or b) no current | |
| Outcomes | Smoking cessation at 12 months, no details on how data were collected or verified | |
| Notes | Abstract only. 390 smokers randomised, but group sizes at baseline not stated | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement | 
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | randomized in a 2:1 manner | 
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | no details | 
| Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | described as 'double‐blind' in the title, but stimulation was at a level that could be detected in the intervention group; blinding was not checked | 
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 390 smokers enrolled, 339 evaluated. No group size at baseline so dropouts cannot be accounted for by allocation group | 
| Other bias | Unclear risk | no baseline details |