Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 23;2014(1):CD000009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000009.pub4

Pickworth 1997.

Methods Randomized trial of electrostimulation
Country: USA
 Recruitment: 'from community'
Participants 121 adults aged over 21 yrs, smoking >20/day for at least 1 yrs, no psychoactive medications; without pregnancy, drug history, medical condition, implanted device, history of seizures or migraine
Interventions 5 consecutive days of 60 min of
 a) electrostimulation, 10Hz 2 msec pulse, 30 µamp to mastoid, or
 b) sham electrostimulation
Outcomes Abstinence after 5 days and 1 month, verified by exhaled CO. Withdrawal symptoms.
Notes Stimulation parameters were criticised by Boutros 1998
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "the instrument manufacturer 'prepared sealed envelopes containing a cartridge and an insert that was randomly assigned to each subject' but method of sequence generation not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed envelopes prepared with cartridge and insert
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Described as double‐blind, and interventions were appropriate
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Dropout rates 16% and 17%
Other bias Low risk No baseline differences