Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 16;2010(6):CD000006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000006.pub2

Nikolov 2006.

Methods Not clear. ? Quasi‐randomised trial. 180 women separated into 3 groups of 60.
Participants 180 women (120 used in the analysis in the review) after episiotomy repair. Women who had had spontaneous tearing or anal sphincter repair were not included.
Parity, age and method of repair not described.
Interventions Intervention group: polyglactin 910 sutures (Vicryl‐Rapide) (60 women).
Comparison group: polyglycolic acid sutures (60 women).
(Women (60) in the third arm of this trial had mixed materials ‐ catgut and silk ‐ and are not included in the analysis.)
Outcomes Pain (moderate or strong pain in the first 5 days after repair, not clear when measured); partial wound dehiscence (partial skin dehiscence and full dehiscence at 5 days post delivery); redness and swelling.
Notes The paper was not published in English and translation notes were used for data extraction.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk No information (bias assessed from translation notes).
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk "separated into 3 groups of 60."
Blinding? 
 Women Unclear risk Not specified.
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No missing data apparent.