Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet HIV. 2020 Jan 31;7(4):e294–e300. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30344-3

Table 1:

Inputs, outputs, and formulas for assessing PrEP success

Output score Criterion threshold Formula

Success criterion 1: maintains HIV uninfected status (a)

What is the PrEP client’s HIV status at the clinic visit? (d) Negative=n, positive=p, or unknown=u HIV status negative (n) or unknown (u) at all clinic visits, meets success criterion 1 If (d=n or d=u) then a=1; otherwise a=0

Criterion 2: PrEP persistence (b)

Did the PrEP client return for their follow-up clinic visit? (e) Yes=1, no=0; if PrEP client does not miss >1 clinic visit during the 12-month period they are considered engaged in care; if client is on PrEP and misses >1 clinic visit they are considered to have dropped out of care If client returned for follow-up clinic visit (e) and is either on PrEP (f) or stopped PrEP in consultation with the health-care provider (g), meets success criterion 2 If e=1 and (f=1 or g=1) then b=1; otherwise b=0
Was PrEP dispensed to the PrEP client? (f) Yes=1, no=0 If client returned for follow-up clinic visit (e) and is either on PrEP (f) or stopped PrEP in consultation with the health-care provider (g), meets success criterion 2 If e=1 and (f=1 or g=1) then b=1; otherwise b=0
Was PrEP stopped in consultation with the health-care provider? (g) Yes=1, no=0; if PrEP-client does not return for follow-up clinic visit this indicator will be scored 0; if client does not return during the follow-up period, but stopped PrEP in consultation with the provider, they are not lost to follow-up; if the PrEP-client does not attend 2 consecutive months of follow-up visits they are lost to follow-up and assumed to have stopped PrEP without consultation with the provider If client returned for follow-up clinic visit (e) and is either on PrEP (f) or stopped PrEP in consultation with the health-care provider (g), meets success criterion 2 If e=1 and (f=1 or g=1) then b=1; otherwise b=0

Criterion 3: appropriate PrEP use* (c)

According to screening, is the PrEP-client at substantial risk of HIV infection? (h) Yes=1, no=0; in countries where formal risk screening is not done, a prescription from a clinician is considered adequate to indicate a substantial risk of infection If client is at substantial risk of HIV infection (h) and dispensed PrEP (f), meets success criterion 3 If h=1 and f≠1 then c=0; otherwise c=1

If f=1 and g=1 (more than once) and h=1 (more than once) PrEP success score=1; otherwise=0. PrEP=pre-exposure prophylaxis.

*

Being appropriately on PrEP depends on a country’s guidelines for determination of risk.