Table 1.
Overview of the approaches and models for high-dimension analysis reviewed.
Name of approach | Reference | Assumptions, method, comment |
---|---|---|
Separate consideration of the potential mediators | ||
Successive tests of association of the potential mediators with the exposure followed by the Sobel mediation test | Küpers et al. 2015 | Approaches can be used to overcome the limited power of the Sobel test. Assumes lack of uncontrolled confounders and mutual influences between mediators. |
Causal inference test | Liu et al. 2013 | Assumes lack of uncontrolled confounders. |
Permutation test | Boca et al. 2014; Sampson et al. 2018 | Tests multiple putative mediators while controlling the family-wise error rate. Replacing Bonferroni correction with a permutation approach improves statistical power (MultiMed R package). |
Joint significance test | Huang 2018 | Separate tests of exposure–mediator and mediator–outcome associations. |
Test for a composite null hypothesis | Huang 2019 | Test statistic is derived by accounting for the composite nature of the null hypothesis. It is less conservative than the Sobel test. |
Simultaneous consideration of the potential mediators | ||
Inverse probability weighting approach | VanderWeele and Vansteelandt 2014 | More efficient if exposure is categorical with a small number of categories. Can accommodate exposure–mediator and mediator–mediator interactions. |
R package HIMA dimension reduction approach | Zhang et al. 2016 | Uses variable selection to reduce the number of mediators (HIMA R package). |
Joint test of a group of mediators | Huang and Pan 2016 | Component-wise testing to evaluate several mediators en bloc rather than testing the marginal contribution of each individual mediator. Spectral decomposition of the mediators. |
Directions of mediations | Chén et al. 2018 | Builds linear combinations among the potential mediators to construct polymediators. |
Sparse principal component–based high-dimension mediation analysis | Zhao et al. 2020 | Dimension reduction of the potential mediators via sparse principal component analysis. |
Mediation analysis for composition data | Sohn and Li 2019 | Tests several mediators en bloc; well-suited for compositional data (i.e., proportions of a whole, as can be the case for microbiome data). |
Distance-based test for mediation analysis (applied to microbiome data) | Zhang et al. 2018 | Reduces multiple testing burden by using a distance-based approach in which all mediators are tested simultaneously. Implies the existence of a relevant distance that can be used between mediators. |
Global test for high‐dimension mediation | Djordjilović et al. 2019 | Global approach for mediation to test simultaneously a group of mediators. |