Table 2.
Correlations between PrEP awareness and barriers, sociodemographic characteristics, sexual health, HIV knowledge, and attitudes in AMSM (N = 219)
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Ever heard about PrEPd | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
2. Ever taken PrEPd | –e | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
3. Friends ever taken PrEPd | –e | − .06 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
4. Would not take PrEP—side effects | − .30c | − .01 | − .12 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
5. Would not know how to get PrEP | − .29c | .01 | − .18 | .21b | 1 | ||||||||||||||
6. Could not afford PrEP | − .21b | − .01 | − .22 | .12 | .21b | 1 | |||||||||||||
7. Age | .22c | .11 | − .05 | − .09 | − .04 | − .03 | 1 | ||||||||||||
8. Racial/ethnic minorityd | − .02 | − .02 | .00 | .08 | .14a | .11 | .08 | 1 | |||||||||||
9. Parent(s) with college degreed | − .01 | .04 | − .03 | .02 | − .02 | − .25c | .01 | − .03 | 1 | ||||||||||
10. Identifies as gayd | .15a | − .06 | .08 | − .11 | .04 | − .05 | − .09 | − .07 | .03 | 1 | |||||||||
11. Out to parentsd | − .06 | .01 | − .06 | − .11 | .06 | − .05 | − .06 | − .09 | .07 | − .03 | 1 | ||||||||
12. Ever used GSN appsd | .27c | .08 | .02 | .00 | − .02 | .11 | .14a | .09 | − .09 | .09 | − .03 | 1 | |||||||
13. Ever tested for HIVd | .21b | .12 | .18 | − .11 | − .12 | .04 | .14a | .05 | .00 | .04 | .19b | .22b | 1 | ||||||
14. Talked to provider about PrEP | .11 | .45c | .25a | − .05 | − .14a | − .10 | .06 | − .04 | .14 | .12 | − .13 | .01 | .26c | 1 | |||||
15. Lifetime sex partners | .03 | .23a | .08 | − .15a | .08 | .03 | .17a | .03 | − .05 | − .04 | .01 | .27c | .23c | .06 | 1 | ||||
16. Condomless receptive anal sex partners | − .15 | .13 | − .17 | − .07 | − .04 | .02 | .07 | − .04 | − .03 | .04 | .02 | .11 | .20a | .00 | .58c | 1 | |||
17. Condomless insertive anal sex partners | − .14 | .38c | − .16 | − .11 | .05 | .07 | .07 | .01 | − .05 | − .01 | .02 | .10 | .04 | .18a | .49c | .20a | 1 | ||
18. Ever had condomless anal sexd | − .16a | .11 | − .35b | .12 | .15 | .22b | .04 | .10 | − .16a | .01 | − .03 | .lla | .09 | .04 | .20b | .23b | .28c | 1 | |
19. HIV knowledge | .28c | .13 | − .06 | − .22b | − .17a | − .12 | .12 | − .07 | − .02 | .10 | .01 | .21b | .16a | .05 | .09 | .00 | − .02 | − .01 | 1 |
20. Perceived risk of HIV | .14a | .14 | .01 | − .17a | .10 | .12 | .06 | .14a | − .16a | .09 | .03 | .10 | .20b | .03 | .22c | .13 | − .02 | .08 | .07 |
For Pearson correlations conducted on two dichotomous variables, results generalize to the Phi coefficient, which provides the same test of independence as the Chi-square test. Race: 0 = non-Hispanic White, 1 = racial/ethnic minority; parental education: 0 = less than college degree, 1 = undergraduate or graduate degree; sexual orientation: 0 = does not identify as gay (e.g., bisexual), 1 = identifies as gay; 0 = not out to parents, 1 = out to parents; app use: 0 = never used GSN apps, 1 = ever used GSN apps; HIV testing: 0 = never tested for HIV, 1 = ever tested for HIV, condomless anal sex: 0 = never had, 1 = ever had.
No correlation coefficient produced because items only given to participants who endorsed “ever heard of PrEP.” Ns in cells range from 61 to 219 due to item branching logic and responses of “I don’t want to answer”
p < .05;
p ≤ .01;
p ≤ .001;
dichotomous variable