Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 11;21(3):e34. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2020.21.e34

Table 2. The number of sites whose samples were collected from February to May 2017.

Variables No. of sites collecting sample No. of sites using unexamined samples No. of examined samples
Certification cancelled Uncertificated Miss-written Combination of two disinfectants
Livestock farm
Laying hens 7 0 0 0 0 7
Parents stock 7 1 0 0 0 6
Broiler 33 2 1 0 0 30
Korean native chicken 2 0 0 0 0 2
Duck 7 0 0 0 0 7
Korean cow (Han-woo) 57 3 0 0 0 54
Dairy cow 15 1 0 0 0 14
Pig 61 12 0 0 0 49
X* 48 1 2 1 0 44
Total (A) (%) 237 20 (8.44) 3 (1.26) 1 (0.42) 0 213 (89.87)
Livestock facility
Abattoir 16 1 0 0 1 14
Chicken abattoir 6 0 0 0 0 6
Feed Manu-facture factory 4 0 0 0 0 4
Total (B) (%) 26 1 (3.85) 0 0 1 (3.85) 24 (92.31)
Official disinfection station
C (%) 14 0 0 0 0 14 (100)
Total (A + B + C) 277 21 (7.58) 2 (0.72) 1 (0.36) 1 (0.36) 251 (90.61)

Sites are classified by facility type and the reasons for unexamined samples.

Concentration of each sample follows the Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency of Korea guidelines.

A, no effective disinfectant was detected; B, low concentration (< 1X); C, proper concentration (1X ≤ and < 2X); D, overconcentration (2X ≤).

X*, the farms raise more than two kinds of livestock.