Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;11:2686. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16240-6

Table 1.

Strength of the different paths by which diversity and habitat degradation affect the stability of bat, bird, and butterfly local communities.

Effects on community stability graphic file with name 41467_2020_16240_Figa_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41467_2020_16240_Figb_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41467_2020_16240_Figc_HTML.gif
Diversity
  Total effects 0.270 0.264 0.487
  Diversity effects 0.116 0.264 0.180
  Phylogenetic diversity effects 0.154 NS 0.307
  Effects via population stability −0.132 NS 0.143
  Effects via population asynchrony 0.402 0.264 0.344
Habitat degradation
  Total effects −0.20 −0.291 −0.134
  Urban effects 0.004 −0.043 −0.247
  Agricultural intensity effects −0.204 −0.248 0.112
  Effects via diversity and phylogenetic diversity −0.026 −0.092 0.013
  Effects via population stability −0.175 −0.198 −0.260
  Effects via population asynchrony NS NS 0.112

The strength of each path is calculated from the standardized coefficients of the structural equation models, multiplying coefficients along a path and summing the results over the different paths. Total effects refer to the sum of the effects by which species richness and phylogenetic diversity loss, or urban gradient and agricultural intensity gradient, affect community stability. Effects via a variable are the sum of the effects of diversity loss/habitat degradation on community stability that are channeled by a direct effect on this variable. NS stands for nonsignificant effects.