Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;11:2737. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16578-x

Fig. 4. Individuals that are consistently faster to arrive at the stimulus maintain larger differences in the heading angle to their nearest neighbour outside of the foraging context.

Fig. 4

Heat map to show the relationship between the predicted difference in heading angle of individuals to their nearest neighbour as a function of inter-individual variation in arrival latency and swimming speed. Predictions are generated within the observed range for each parameter from a LMM with the mean heading difference to the nearest neighbour (averaged over every frame in the three minutes prior to the stimulus presentations) as the response variable, and the individual identity intercepts from a model of latency to arrive at the stimulus (Supplementary Table 6, excluding arrival order) and mean speed (averaged over every frame in the three minutes prior to the stimulus presentations) as main effects. The heat shows that within the observed range of mean swimming speeds, the heading difference of individuals to their nearest neighbour is larger for individuals that arrive consistently sooner at the stimulus (more negative values).