Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;11:464. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00464

Table 1.

Overview over studies investigating the effect of Blebbistatin onto cardiac electrophysiology.

Study Δ APD N Conc. [μM] Species Preparation
Fedorov et al. (2007) Yes N = 6 5–10 Rabbit Isolated Heart (Ventr.)
No N = 5 5–10 Rabbit Wedge Prep. (Atria)
No N = 5 5–10 Rabbit Wedge Prep. (SAN)
NA NA 5–10 Rat Cardiomyocyte (Ventr.)
Dou et al. (2007) NA NA NA Mouse Papillary Muscle
No N = 11 10 Mouse Cardiomyocyte (Ventr.)
Jou et al. (2010) No N = 4 10 Zebrafish Atria
No N = 4 10 Zebrafish Ventricles
Fenton et al. (2008) No N = 1 10–15 Horse Isolated Heart (Atria)
No N = 1 10–15 Horse Isolated Heart (Ventr.)
Zhang et al. (2016) No N = 1 20 Pig Isolated Heart (Ventr.)
Brack et al. (2013) Yes N = 39 5 Rabbit Isolated Heart (Ventr.)
Lee et al. (2019) Yes N = 5 NA Pig Isolated Heart (Ventr.)
Kappadan et al. Yes N = 10 3 Rabbit Isolated Heart (Ventr.)

Overall, the findings regarding APD difference (Δ APD) with and without Blebbistatin remain inconclusive and seem to depend on preparations and species.